Not sure what your point is?
The Alzheimer's Society?
http://www.reform.uk/about/transparency/
I see Nick Bosanquet, Frank Field (Lab) and Jeremy Browne (LD) on the
advisory board.
Perhaps you support the report but my own view remains:
Not helpful, written by children as if was just a game, and confusing
a few worthwhile aims with some all too tarnished means.
John Appleby has said some useful things recently.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Appleby_(economist)
Julian
At 23:32 19/04/2016, you wrote:
>Whose pocket finances reform.uk
>
>On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, 07:54 Julian Bradley, <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>
> > Perhaps it would be clearer to say that as the matter may go to court
> > he could have an understandable reluctance to share his case (or
> > damage his case) before required to.
> >
> > As to his power to influence the contracts trusts offer, it would
> > appear de facto substantial, AND the BMA would also wish to see
> > national standard contracts - not negotiations with each individual trust.
> >
> > Neither of these observations alters that fact that what he's doing
> > is wrong, but I have little doubt a Blair or Brown government could
> > very easily have gone down the same route.
> >
> > I do however miss Norman Lamb's input - not perfect but one of the
> > best health ministers in my lifetime, not because of his politics but
> > because of knowledge and commitment.
> >
> > What would be great to see is a well argued and academic debunking of
> > paper like the one below.
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.reform.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Reform_who_cares_the_future_of_general_practice.pdf
> >
> > That is the backdrop of thinking against which General Practice and
> > indeed medical practice is operating.
> >
> > Not helpful, written by children as if was just a game, and confusing
> > a few worthwhile aims with some all too tarnished means.
> >
> > J
|