I think what they mean is that your proposal was peer-reviewed and granted access to the ESRF.
So the 3-year period starts at the time of data collection - but, it seems this three-year period can be renewed, although this is not stated clearly enough, only mentioned in the news item.
Mark J van Raaij
Dpto de Estructura de Macromoleculas
Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia - CSIC
c/Darwin 3
E-28049 Madrid, Spain
tel. (+34) 91 585 4616
http://wwwuser.cnb.csic.es/~mjvanraaij
> On 8 Apr 2016, at 14:44, Jurgen Bosch <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 8, 2016, at 5:47 AM, F.Xavier Gomis-Rüth <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> The new ESRF data policy stipulates that all raw data and the associated metadata from peer reviewed access experiments at the ESRF will be open access after an initial embargo period of 3 years, during which access is restricted to the experimental team, represented by the Main Proposers. Proprietary research experiments are excluded.
>
>
> I actually would read that part differently - I might be wrong though.
> But the way I see it, is the keyword “peer reviewed” - your data when you collect is not peer reviewed, hence it is not the start date of the three year period, however once you published then the there year grab period begins.
>
> Just my 2 cents - any thoughts on this?
>
> __________________________________________
> Jürgen Bosch, Ph.D.
> Division of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy/Immunology
> Case Western Reserve University
> 2109 Adelbert Rd, BRB 835
> Cleveland, OH 44106
>
> CEO & Co-Founder at InterRayBio, LLC
>
> Johns Hopkins University
> Bloomberg School of Public Health
> Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
>
>
>
|