JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ASSISTIVE-TECHNOLOGY Archives


ASSISTIVE-TECHNOLOGY Archives

ASSISTIVE-TECHNOLOGY Archives


ASSISTIVE-TECHNOLOGY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ASSISTIVE-TECHNOLOGY Home

ASSISTIVE-TECHNOLOGY Home

ASSISTIVE-TECHNOLOGY  April 2016

ASSISTIVE-TECHNOLOGY April 2016

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Does your organisation have a policy on providing transcriptions for AV content?

From:

Patricia Meach <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Patricia Meach <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:19:14 +0000

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines) , image002.png (1 lines) , image003.png (1 lines)

Hi



I am in the process of writing a report on 'how inclusive is my institution?' as part of my PDA in Inclusiveness.  I have chosen to concentrate my investigation on the accessibility of my institution's VLE for students with additional support needs; with a particular view of evaluating the content.  I have therefore found the recent emails  regarding AV content both interesting and invaluable for my research.



Many thanks,





Pat Meach

Learning Inclusion Facilitator



Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Team (EDIT)



Fife College



Halbeath

Dunfermline

Fife

KY11 8DY



Tel: 0344 248 0115     EXT 5529 or 5254











________________________________________

From: Assistive Technology interest group [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Alistair McNaught [[log in to unmask]]

Sent: 11 April 2016 10:22

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Does your organisation have a policy on providing transcriptions for AV content?



Hi everybody

this is definitely an area where you need to tread carefully because for many learners, video IS the accessible alternative format - an alternative to the standard text offering.



Stuart is absolutely right that having too high an expectation could simply result in lecturers deciding not to use videos. These are some of the suggested criteria that might be wise to inform any policies: they are based on overarching principles such as



·         Take a pragmatic approach that seeks to maximise opportunities whilst minimising barriers.



·         Focus on things that demonstrably make a difference to learners whether they have a disability or not.



·         Tailor the expectations to the skills and responsibilities of the individuals. Expect more from e-learning professionals than from video-savvy teaching staff (or students). But expect more from the latter than from those  uploading a video for the first time.



·         Use workflows efficiently. When making a video, create a script to work from then use the script as the transcript.



This would be my suggested criteria to consider in any policy.



Availability of information



·         Is the video an alternative format for existing text content (for example explaining what is already in a book or handout)? If so it is arguable that making an alternative format of an existing alternative format is a little obsessive ☺



·         Can the video be controlled without a mouse? If a blind or motor impaired learner cannot start the video independently your investments in subtitling et cetera will be wasted.

Nature of content and context



·         What are the key teaching points in the video? For many learners, a bulleted summary of the key teaching points will be a lot more useful than a multipage transcript.



·         Do the visuals supplement the narrative or work independently? When the audio information effectively replicates the visual information - for example on some instructional videos - there may be little need for additional text descriptions.



·         Risk factors - what is the risk of disabled learners being disadvantaged by lack of an alternative formats content? The need for alternative formats is high for content with



o   high longevity – videos you intend to use for the next few years, and therefore will be exposed to lots of learners.



o   a high-stakes context – eg contributing towards assessed modules and likely to impact on results.



o   large and not necessarily knowable audience (eg Mooc)

on the other hand, videos from this term’s  geology field trip that are pertinent only to this cohort of 30 students, none of whom have sight or hearing difficulties will hardly justify staff time being invested in subtitling et cetera.



·         Identify appropriate alternatives – the tutor is often best placed to decide whether the key video content is best offered as a bulleted summary, a subtitled video or a full text transcript since it will depend on the purpose of the video within the planned learning activities. Each of these can benefit all learners. Scene description for blind learners is a specialised activity and is best done on a case by case basis with expert support from UKAAF.



Obviously these are broad brush considerations and open to improvement and amendment. The critical balance to encourage the use of multimedia in an ‘accessibility aware’ way that recognises (i) that video (and audio) can be an accessibility solution even without further work and (ii) that appropriate accessibility support - whether summaries, subtitles or transcripts – benefit all users by allowing cutting and pasting, easy search, checking of ambiguous spellings/dates etc.



Alistair







[Jisc]<http://www.jisc.ac.uk/>

Alistair McNaught

Subject specialist (accessibility and inclusion)



T 0203 819 8210

M 07443984111

Skype alistair_techdis

Twitter  @alistairm

One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA



jisc.ac.uk<http://www.jisc.ac.uk/>







From: Assistive Technology interest group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stuart Milligan

Sent: 07 April 2016 12:53

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Does your organisation have a policy on providing transcriptions for AV content?



Hi Margaret,



I am looking into this at the moment too.



I have been looking into outsourcing for transcripts but it proves quite expensive. However all suppliers seem confident of a quick turnaround.



We have a large quantity of video that ideally we would like to be subtitled. I’ve looked into touch typists, palantypists, BSL interpreters etc but I remain unsure of the best approach to take.



There is perhaps too much content to get staff members to attempt to tackle it in-house, and I think that asking lecturers to do it may have a negative effect on them using video content.



I would be keen to gather everyone’s opinion and thoughts.



Kind regards,



Stuart



Stuart Milligan

Assistive Technology Development Officer



Phone: 0141 272 9000

E-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Web: Glasgow Clyde College<http://www.glasgowclyde.ac.uk/>



[cid:image003.png@01D193D3.F58658A0]



From: Assistive Technology interest group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Margaret McKay

Sent: 07 April 2016 12:39

To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Does your organisation have a policy on providing transcriptions for AV content?



Hi there,



I wondered if any of your institutions have a specific approach or policy on providing transcriptions for AV content in various situations?



One particular HEi has been looking into this, and their Educational Development Manager is interested in the approaches that other organisations take. Currently They provide transcriptions for any audio or video that they create in-house, however they are considering their approach not only to the content that they create internally but to things that they did not.  They want to develop a policy on:





·         Audio and video created by a lecturer and uploaded to Blackboard



·         Audio and video sourced externally (YouTube etc.) and uploaded by either a lecturer or us to Blackboard



From a legal perspective John Kelly our subject specialist (technology and the law) has offered his view on copyright aspects of this issue (in particular of using third party content on You Tube). He said:



Making accessible formats for disabled people is fine as long as you have a lawful copy of the work. So as long as the YouTube content is not infringing material (copied/published without the rights holder’s permission) then making available transcripts for the primary purpose of making the work accessible for those that need it is lawful. Some explanation of the current law and what’s allowed is available in this publication - https://goo.gl/bro4Sn.



I’m wondering if your institution has a strategy regarding this or if particular approaches have been made?



Regards,



Margaret



[Jisc]<http://www.jisc.ac.uk/>





Margaret McKay

Subject specialist (accessibility and inclusion) Scotland



Mobile: 07443 984444

Skype: Margaret.Jisc

Twitter: @Mags_McKay



Jisc Scotland, c/o Argyll Court, The Castle Business Park, Stirling,  FK9 4TY





jisc.ac.uk<http://www.jisc.ac.uk/>

Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under Company No. 5747339, VAT No. GB 882 5529 90. Jisc’s registered office is: One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800. jisc.ac.uk<http://www.jisc.ac.uk/>



___________________________________________________________________________________



This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of Glasgow Clyde College. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please ignore and delete the message. Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, all e-mails entering and leaving Glasgow Clyde College are subject to systematic monitoring and may be recorded. It is the responsibility of the recipient to scan this email and any attachments for computer viruses or other defects. The sender does not accept liability for any loss or damage of any nature, however caused, which may result directly or indirectly from this email or any attached file. This message is confidential and for internal use only. You may not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone external to Glasgow Clyde College.

___________________________________________________________________________________



This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of Glasgow Clyde College. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please ignore and delete the message. Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, all e-mails entering and leaving Glasgow Clyde College are subject to systematic monitoring and may be recorded. It is the responsibility of the recipient to scan this email and any attachments for computer viruses or other defects. The sender does not accept liability for any loss or damage of any nature, however caused, which may result directly or indirectly from this email or any attached file. You may not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone external to Glasgow Clyde College.



________________________________





The information contained within this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete this e-mail and any attachments immediately. The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.



The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the author's employer (the College). The College does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.



The College, is a registered Scottish charity, No: SC021203

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager