Hi Jeremy,
I’m actually surprised as Salvatore said he made a correction for Lancaster for February.
Elena
On 4 Mar 2016, at 14:54, Jeremy Coles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> The draft Tier-2 figures have been circulated.
>
> ALICE (http://wlcg-sam.cern.ch/reports/2016/201602/wlcg/WLCG_All_Sites_ALICE_Feb2016.pdf):
>
> All okay.
>
> ATLAS (http://wlcg-sam.cern.ch/reports/2016/201602/wlcg/WLCG_All_Sites_ATLAS_Feb2016.pdf):
>
> Lancaster (0%:0%). Presumably the same ATLAS path issue as in recent months?
>
> CMS (http://wlcg-sam.cern.ch/reports/2016/201602/wlcg/WLCG_All_Sites_CMS_Feb2016.pdf):
>
> All okay.
>
> LHCb (http://wlcg-sam.cern.ch/reports/2016/201602/wlcg/WLCG_All_Sites_LHCB_Feb2016.pdf):
>
> QMUL (86%:86%).
>
>
> If you have any re-computations being requested or explanations to share for any figures this month please let me know.
>
> Many thanks,
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: WLCG Office <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: T2 reliability & availability - February 2016
>> Date: 4 March 2016 14:36:52 GMT
>> To: "project-wlcg-cb (Members of the WLCG CB)" <[log in to unmask]>
>> Cc: "project-lcg-gdb (LCG - Grid Deployment Board)" <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>, "sam-support (SAM support)" <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> The draft T2 reliability & availability reports for February 2016 are now available at:
>>
>> http://wlcg-sam.cern.ch/reports/2016/201602/wlcg/
>>
>> Please check your data and send any comments to [log in to unmask] by Mon 14 March.
>>
>> Any requests for recomputation must be submitted via GGUS within the next 10 calendar days; full details here.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Cath
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> WLCG Office
>> IT Dept - CERN
>> CH-1211 Genève, Switzerland
>> www.cern.ch/wlcg
>
|