Hello,
I'd also be interested in getting involved. As well as support staff reviewing researchers' DMPs, we need to support supervisors when they begin to review their doctoral students' DMPs, so a more generic rubric may form part of that here.
If there's any scope for discussion at/around the RDMF, that sounds a good plan.
All the best,
Georgina Parsons
Research Data Manager, Information Services
Building 55, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL
W: www.cranfield.ac.uk E: [log in to unmask]
T: +44 (0) 1234 75 4548
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended only for the named addressee. If you are not the named addressee, please accept our apology, notify the sender immediately and then delete the email. We request that you do not disclose, use, copy or distribute any information within it.
Any opinions expressed are not necessarily the corporate view of Cranfield University. This email is not intended to be contractually binding unless specifically stated and the sender is an authorised University signatory.
Whilst we have taken steps to ensure that this email and all attachments are free from any virus, we advise that, in keeping with good computing practice, the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
-----Original Message-----
From: Research Data Management discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Grace, Stephen 5
Sent: 10 March 2016 10:27
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: DMP evaluation rubrics (for UK funders)
And I'd like to get involved too. I'm sure we could do some of the work using a shared online document (per funder), but I attended the same IDCC workshop as Mary and found particular value in brainstorming with others around a table. The next Research Data Management Forum is in London on 27 April - maybe a discussion there about how to tackle drafting a select number of rubrics, or even a satellite event?
Regards,
Steve
--
Stephen Grace
Scholarly Communications & Repository Manager
Library and Learning Resources
London South Bank University
103 Borough Road, London, SE1 0AA
Tel: +44 (0)20 7815 6634
Email: [log in to unmask]
Twitter: @StephenGraceful
ORCiD: 0000-0001-8874-2671
-----Original Message-----
From: Research Data Management discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Federica Fina
Sent: 09 March 2016 17:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: DMP evaluation rubrics (for UK funders)
Hi Mary,
It would be a very useful tool to have and we would be happy to get involved.
Best wishes,
Federica
Dr Federica Fina
Data Scientist (Digital Research)
University of St Andrews Library
North Street, St Andrews, KY16 9TR
Tel: +44 (0)1334 462343
Email: [log in to unmask]
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2594-350X
Research Data Management:
http://researchdata.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Research Data Management discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sarah Jones (HATII)
Sent: 09 March 2016 16:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: DMP evaluation rubrics (for UK funders)
Hi Mary
This is a great idea, and definitely something I'd be happy to get involved with.
For others who weren't at the workshop, you can see Amanda's slides and exercise at: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/events/workshops/supporting-and-reviewing-data-management-plans
All best
Sarah
-----Original Message-----
From: Research Data Management discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mary Donaldson
Sent: 09 March 2016 15:53
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: DMP evaluation rubrics (for UK funders)
Hello list,
After attending the supporting DMPs workshop at IDCC a couple of weeks ago, I've been entertaining the idea of developing a set of evaluation rubrics for data management plans.
For those of you not at IDCC, Amanda Whitmire (Stamford) gave a demonstration of how these can be developed for a variety of purposes, with a quick hands-on exercise for illustration.
My interest in this project would be to develop rubrics for evaluating DMPs for the purpose of assessing a DMP against the funder's criteria and giving feedback to the researcher. A separate rubric would need to be developed for each funder template (though I anticipate that there might be quite a bit of commonality). Amanda stressed that these rubrics worked best if they were developed / evaluated by several people, so I was wondering whether any other UK-based (since I'm primarily interested in creating these for UK-based funders) RDM folk wanted to join me on this? We could then share our outputs and save each institution developing something similar in parallel.
Best wishes,
Mary
Dr Mary Donaldson
Service Coordinator,
Research Data Management,
University of Glasgow
Copyright in this email and in any attachments belongs to London South Bank University. This email, and its attachments if any, may be confidential or legally privileged and is intended to be seen only by the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please note the following: (1) You should take immediate action to notify the sender and delete the original email and all copies from your computer systems; (2) You should not read copy or use the contents of the email nor disclose it or its existence to anyone else. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and should not be taken as those of London South Bank University, unless this is specifically stated. London South Bank University is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales. The following details apply to London South Bank University: Company number - 00986761; Registered office and trading address - 103 Borough Road London SE1 0AA; VAT number - 778 1116 17 Email address - [log in to unmask]
|
