JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MCG Archives


MCG Archives

MCG Archives


MCG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MCG Home

MCG Home

MCG  February 2016

MCG February 2016

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Open cultural data in 2016

From:

Richard Light <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Museums Computer Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 3 Feb 2016 18:35:51 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (180 lines)

Jamie,

I think one question we can usefully ask is whether our current 
collections management systems are actually the best starting point for 
a move in a Linked Data direction.  The orthodox approach has always 
been that 'publishing a collection' means 'putting the collections 
database online', but this hasn't always worked that well even for 
old-school HTML pages.  We've all seen those collections search pages 
containing lists of minimal tombstone records ...

We should maybe take a step back and ask "what information do we want to 
share on the Web?".  I'm sure the answer wouldn't be "all of our 
collections, and nothing else".  Nor, I must say, would it be "lots of 
Linked Data".  I see Linked Data URLs as a means to end: a common frame 
of reference in a shared information space, full of stories.  We need to 
work out what concepts we share an interest in, and create Linked Data 
resources for them.  They will be people, places, historical events, 
classes of object, /not /the individual objects in our collections.

Richard

On 2016-02-03 12:46 PM, Unwin Jamie wrote:
> I think part of the issue is legacy data and the lack of first mover advantage.
>
> Starting afresh it’s (fairly) easy to ensure that every term, category, person or attribute is tied to a linked data URI (although which sets of URI’s and how similar sets are interlinked is still an open question).
>
> Hopefully collection managment systems will start to incorporate URIs and Linked Data seamlessly into their products/interfaces, so it should start to happen by default (ie. if I pick a term from a Thesaurus my collection system stores both the URI and a String and most orgs will go with the default sources unless they have good reason to go elsewhere). Likewise an interface to a person authority should ideally / automatically check the public space for common URIs before allowing me to create my own record (even if I’m just augment the base URI with my own biography/data).
>
> Where it becomes tricky is when you have hundreds of thousands of existing record that may take years to tidy up by hand, which is the situation most large organisation find themselves in.
>
> While I expect extremely difficult to perfect, I can’t help but thinking that a public API/service which could weight a match between a free text field and a URI based on context (the other fields in the records, the relationships or the legacy thesaurus a term was possibly taken from) and return a linked data URI for each attribute / relationship / person with a degree of certainty for each (ie. a percentage weighting), would be a god send (it’s probaly god like it it’s complexity too!)
>
> Obviously these URI’s couldn’t be blindly accepted, but anything with a weighting of say over 80% could be more quickly checked by hand than by going back over your record and manual finding/adding a URL for each term.
>
> Not sure if there are exiting projects out there that are already working on this sort of thing, I expect there are and I am just not aware of them.
>
> Jamie
>
> From: Museums Computer Group on behalf of Richard Light
> Reply-To: Museums Computer Group
> Date: Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 11:42
> To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>"
> Subject: Open cultural data in 2016
>
> Denis,
>
> I think the rate of progress towards open cultural data is fairly
> glacial here in the U.K. See my provocation to UKMW15 [1] for a summary
> of some relevant issues.
>
> As you imply, one major issue is centralization vs. silos. I support
> the idea that individual institutions should take responsibility for
> publishing their own resources, but in a way which is interoperable with
> the rest of the community.
>
> A central initiative which is worthy of note is the Research and
> Education Space [2]. This offers a platform for cultural heritage
> Linked Data resources, which a community of developers is now eager to
> get to work on, developing educational applications. All it needs is
> lots of cultural heritage Linked Data ...
>
> One problem is: what does 'interoperable' look like? I have been
> advocating the use of the CIDOC CRM [3] to express statements about
> collections objects in an interoperable manner, but there is no
> immediate answer to the problem that all actual collections data
> currently held by MLAs is expressed as string values, not URLs. Most of
> the software systems MLAs are using offer them no help to move towards a
> Linked Data publication strategy. And (with a few exceptions, such as
> the Getty vocabularies, Geonames, ...) there are no common frameworks we
> can turn to as a source of such URLs.
>
> I would be delighted to be told I'm wrong, but my impression is that
> most UK institutions don't really 'get' the open/linked data idea, and
> where they do, they have no idea how to go about supporting or
> implementing it.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Richard
>
> [1]
> http://www.slideshare.net/RichardLight/museums-home-of-unlinked-data-57824586
> [2] https://bbcarchdev.github.io/res/
> [3] http://cidoc-crm.org/
> P.S. I thought MCG were putting all these talks up after the meeting.
> Clearly not ...
>
> On 2016-02-03 12:34 AM, Denis Nazarov wrote:
>> Hello MCG,
>>
>> I am one of the engineers working on Mediachain.
>>
>> Mediachain
>> <https://medium.com/mine-labs/introducing-mediachain-a696f8fd2035#.414x0afc4>
>> is an open source, blockchain based metadata registry that enables
>> institutions and developers to easily publish, use, link and extend media
>> datasets, while maintaining attribution for contributors and creative works.
>>
>> Instead of releasing metadata as static data dumps
>> <https://github.com/NYPL-publicdomain/data-and-utilities> or requiring
>> developers to use disparate siloed APIs
>> <http://museum-api.pbworks.com/w/page/21933420/Museum%C2%A0APIs>,
>> Mediachain functions as a shared data layer where institutions can
>> verifiably publish data. Once ingested into the datastore, developers can
>> easily reuse and extend it without obscuring its source.
>>
>> The goal of Mediachain is to lower the barrier to publishing and consuming
>> open data, while preserving data attribution. Datasets are no longer
>> siloed, but integrated with one another so each new entrant has an
>> opportunity to securely enrich the existing corpus.
>>
>> I was inspired by Mia Ridge's awesome article from 2013
>> <http://www.museum-id.com/idea-detail.asp?id=387> to reach out to this
>> group to ask:
>>
>> - What is the state of open cultural data three years later in 2016?
>>
>> - For technologists with experience at GLAMs, how can current open data
>> strategies and practices be improved to enable richer collaboration between
>> institutions and a digital audience?
>>
>> We are looking to pilot Mediachain with a few institutions and their open
>> data and I'd love to talk to anyone interested. Here is more detail on the
>> Mediachain protocol
>> <https://medium.com/mine-labs/mediachain-483f49cbe37a#.vdksi4onb>.
>>
>> -Denis
>>
>> ****************************************************************
>> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
>> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
>> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
>> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
>> ****************************************************************
>>
> --
> *Richard Light*
>
> ****************************************************************
> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> ****************************************************************
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
>
> ________________________________
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail and attachments are intended for the named addressee only and are confidential.
>
> If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately, delete the
> message from your computer system and destroy any copies.
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not reflect
> the views of the Science Museum Group
>
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ****************************************************************
>         website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
>         Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
>        Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
>   [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> ****************************************************************

-- 
*Richard Light*

****************************************************************
       website:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
       Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
      Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
 [un]subscribe:  http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager