Dear Christian,
Thank you very much for your answer, I will test this.
Best wishes,
Barbara
On 27/01/2016 09:57, Christian Gaser wrote:
> Dear Barbara,
>
> difficult to answer and it depends on your data. The additional use of the T2-weighted image can considerably improve skull-stripping and segmentation quality. Thus, I would simply try both approaches for some of your data and check the quality of the segmentations and choose the approach that better fits to your data.
>
> Best,
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:43:40 +0000, Barbara Kreilkamp <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Dear SPMers,
>>
>> I am wondering which tool you'd suggest, SPM12 Segment using the
>> multiple channels (T1 and T2-weighted data) or CAT12 with only T1w- data
>> (as I understand multimodal segmentation is not implemented here yet).
>>
>> I notice that CAT12 takes about 4 times as long as the multimodal
>> approach in SPM12.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Best wishes,
>> Barbara
>>
>> On 28/08/2015 12:36, John Ashburner wrote:
>>> Yes, providing you are using a recent version. I would strongly
>>> suggest using SPM12.
>>>
>>> In the user interface, you would specify two channels of information
>>> (one for the T1 and one for the T2). Note that both images need to be
>>> in voxel-for-voxel alignment first, so you may need to coregister and
>>> reslice the T2 to match the T1 (or vice verca).
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> -John
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 August 2015 at 19:06, Lili He <[log in to unmask]
>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear SPM experts,
>>> I am just wondering whether or not SPM supports multimodality
>>> segmentation. I have both T1 and T2 brain images; could/how I use
>>> both of them to possibly enhance the tissue segmentation?
>>> Thank you,
>>> Lili
>>>
>>>
>>
>
|