On 1/31/16, 11:22 AM, Steven Dytman wrote:

Hi Steve,

There has been a lot of work in NoVA with your MEC model, and people are 
only just now getting a sense of how it helps.  But there are two 
aspects that they would find helpful, these are things that they are 
currently dealing with by reweighting.

Ideally, these are quantities that can be set in the config file.  Then 
NoVA could just do what they want.

1)  The first is the np/nn ratio.   People were wondering about the 
current ratio 1:4, which seems opposite from the theory, MINERvA paper, 
and JLab results.   Can that be an adjustable parameter?

2)  The normalization of the cross section, and the turnoff from 1 to 
5.  These could be three parameters, with the current values as defaults.

Cheers,  Hugh
> if these are the correct conditions, I have no concerns.
>
> Does Nova have concerns about either MEC model they wish to have 
> addressed?
> I haven't heard anything, either positive or negative.
>
> Steve
>
> On 01/30/2016 06:03 PM, Robert W Hatcher wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>    I just made a simple change to GSimpleNtpFlux in R-2_10_4 that 
>> fixes (relative to R-2_10_2) a problem that bit NOvA last week when 
>> they moved to the 2_10 series.  As far as I can tell the only other 
>> changes to R-2_10_4 are author list updates and copyright date 
>> changes.  Could we open this tag for public use, like _now_.  This is 
>> time critical for them to get started on generation for Neutrino2016 
>> in July.
>>
>> -robert
>>
>> Robert W. Hatcher
>> Computational Physics Developer
>> Fermilab CS/SCD/SCS/PDS  | WH9NW
>> PO Box 500 MS 234, Batavia IL 60510
>> [log in to unmask]
>> office:   630-840-3102
>> cell:     630-234-0091