JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  January 2016

CCP4BB January 2016

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: HEM group of cyt c

From:

"Edward A. Berry" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Edward A. Berry

Date:

Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:25:05 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (39 lines)

On 01/27/2016 07:17 AM, DOOLAN, AISHLING wrote:
> This is my first entry on the CCP4bb. I am working on depositing a structure containing cytochrome c to the PDB.
>
> I used the 3tyi pdb file as a template when running pdbset and then Phaser Molecular replacement in CCP4. I carried out multiple rounds of refinement in Phenix.
>
> During deposition the heme group of cytochrome c was flagged as having no matches in the CCD, the ligand dictionary.
>
> In one chain (A) there are two additional protons on the heme that shouldn't be there. Any ideas as to how this happened and/or how to approach fixing it?
>
> In chain B I can't see any problems with the heme and can only guess it was flagged because it's geometry is slightly different to the one in the CCD. Is this a problem?
>
>
> <https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/entry/pdb/3tyi/>
>

Hi Aishling,
The last time I deposited a c-type heme there did seem to be some problems with the parameters,
both in CCP4 and the pdb, which I described here:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1408&L=ccp4bb&F=&S=&P=116521

HOWEVER you say the heme has no matches in the ligand dictionary.
I think that match is made based on the 3-letter residue code for the
heme, not on geometry. If you had a glucose molecule and called it HEM or HEC
it would be recognized as such (but there would be a lot of missing atoms and
unrecognized atoms.
So what is the 3-letter code for heme in your deposition?
If HEM as indicated in your subject, then I don't understand it.
Maybe someone more familiar with the deposition process can answer.
Or send us the exact error message- maybe it is not a failure to
recognize the HEM but rather its atoms?

Cytochrome c structures usually call the heme HEC or HEM.
In principle the HEC.cif should stretch out the double bond in
the vinyl groups to single, whereas with HEM you wold have to do that with an edit.
In either case you need LINK records, not only for the axial ligand Met
and His, but also for the two cysteins that bond to the vinyl group.
I notice 3tyi uses HEM and lacks LINK records for the cys bonds.
eab

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager