Reply-To: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> >> That is a reasonable idea and is essential what was done in my 2014 paper >> with our own in-house custom scripts to identify bad images and add dummy >> variables to the GLM for each bad time point. >> >> Best Regards, >> Donald McLaren, PhD >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Yann Quidé <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Dear experts, >>> >>> Would it be unreasonable to use the ART toolbox to identify bad images, >>> and then use the new SPM regressors file (with the identified images + 6 >>> movements regressors) in gPPI analyses? >>> >>> Thanks for your time. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Yann >> >> >> >> > > >[log in to unmask] |