Thanks Doug. I'll think on that.
Bill
> On 10 Sep 2015, at 12:33 am, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I really like the first stanza, as image, Bill. Wonder if the first lines of the 2nd could go first? Or be allowed to be implication?
>
> Doug
>> On Sep 8, 2015, at 4:12 PM, Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Kink
>>
>> Dawn hovers,
>> faint light brightening.
>> Cloud horizon
>> rupture.
>> Lying on its side,
>> a giant wine glass
>> outlined in cloud strip
>> jags expected
>> evenness.
>>
>> Framed by bedroom
>> window, equal sky
>> portions sit within and
>> without the vast vessel.
>> Sleepy eyes flicker.
>> Clouds bleed apart
>> almost imperceptibly,
>> spilling
>> into mass whiteness.
>>
>> bw
>> 9.9.15
>
> Douglas Barbour
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuation 2 (UofAPress).
> Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
>
> Done in by creation itself.
>
> I mean the gods. Not us. Well us too.
> The gods moved into books. Who wrote the books?
> We wrote the books. In whose dream, then are we dreaming?
>
> Robert Kroetsch.
>
|