Yes, a good entry for the insult dictionary….
Doug
On Sep 1, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Max Richards <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Yeah, Bill.
>
> You have a feel for such idioms.
>
> (The one line I stumble over is
>
> nous lack
>
> maybe cause you force the noun to be an adjective…
>
> Max
>
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 14:44, Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> In the lexicon of insults,
>> somewhere between
>> a klutz and a dipshit?
>>
>> Usually preceded
>> by the adjective 'stupid',
>> ignorance is implicit.
>>
>> But a particular sort
>> of twittery earns
>> gittishness, not merely
>>
>> unawareness; rather
>> a deep and obvious
>> nous lack.
>>
>> Your standard git
>> announces himself
>> (females are unaccountably
>>
>> excluded from githood)
>> by doing something
>> no non-git would be
>>
>> caught dead doing
>> or by failing to do what
>> sensibles manage unthinkably.
>>
>> If not born a git,
>> beware: you might yet
>> make a git of yourself.
>>
>> bw
>>
>> Thanks L, for providing the impetus here.
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuation 2 (UofAPress).
Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
Done in by creation itself.
I mean the gods. Not us. Well us too.
The gods moved into books. Who wrote the books?
We wrote the books. In whose dream, then are we dreaming?
Robert Kroetsch.
|