JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACB-POCT Archives


ACB-POCT Archives

ACB-POCT Archives


ACB-POCT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACB-POCT Home

ACB-POCT Home

ACB-POCT  September 2015

ACB-POCT September 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Evaluating glucose meters

From:

"Sargazi Mansour (WIRRAL UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST)" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ACB Point-of-Care Testing <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 25 Sep 2015 16:51:34 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (96 lines)

Dear all,


The following link issued by FDA titled "Blood Glucose Monitoring Test Systems for Prescription Point-of-Care Use" may answer most of the questions raised on the systematic approach on POCT glucose meters comparison studies.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm380325.pdf


Thanks
Mansour


-----Original Message-----
From: ACB Point-of-Care Testing [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cambridge Anthony (PLYMOUTH HOSPITALS NHS TRUST)
Sent: 25 September 2015 14:55
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Evaluating glucose meters

---
This message was sent from an email address external to NHSmail but gives the appearance of being from an NHSmail (@nhs.net) address. The recipient should verify the sender and content before acting upon information contained within.

The identified sender is [log in to unmask]
---
Hi Darren

I wouldn't expect that to be the case but I will be looking into it. I would expect to be validating the POCT method against the lab method for the analyte. That would mean establishing the differences between capillary and serum/plasma with regard to each' method in use. What's the use of knowing a capillary blood result for glucose using the lab method when you are never going to be generating patient data in this way? If ISO 15189 states this is required, it will be another case of the standards not adding any worth at all to the service that we provide our patients. Just a time consuming waste of laboratory and POCT personnel time plus the cost.

I would expect to producing a validation report so that clinicians know the statistical differences between the POCT method and the lab method to help management of the patient using both.

Regards

Tony Cambridge
Lead Biomedical Scientist
and POCT Coordinator
T: 01752 792294
E: [log in to unmask]
________________________________________
From: ACB Point-of-Care Testing [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Darren Browne [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 25 September 2015 11:25
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Evaluating glucose meters

---
This message was sent from an email address external to NHSmail but gives the appearance of being from an NHSmail (@nhs.net) address. The recipient should verify the sender and content before acting upon information contained within.

The identified sender is [log in to unmask]
---
Hi all,
       I wondered if any body can share their experiences of evaluating their POCT glucose meters against the laboratory that will satisfy the ISO 15198 or 22870 standard. I am having difficulty with this as there are issues:
 1. Sample type - the evaluation should be done on a like for like basis e.g capillary sample (POCT) vs capillary sample (lab). This is difficult to determine on the lab analyser (small sample size).
2. Sample stability issues - only got a short time to analyse sample particularly if it is a capillary sample.
3. Collecting samples across the measuring range of POCT glucose meters e.g <4 mmol/L 4. Ethical approval

Any thoughts or ideas most welcomed.

Regards,

Darren Browne
Point Of Care Manager
Darent Valley Hospital
Pathology department (Level 3)
Darenth Wood Road, Dartford
Kent DA2 8DA

Tel: 01322 428100 x4876
Email: [log in to unmask]


********************************************************************************************************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents:
to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere

********************************************************************************************************************


********************************************************************************************************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the
sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents:
to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland
NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients
NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere

********************************************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager