Dear Mariana,
On Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:55 AM, Mariana Curado Malta wrote:
> Still on Karen's email. I think we really need a way to express an Application
> Profille using RDF. That was one of the issues/complains of the developers I
> have interviewed during my PhD work, DSP was not interesting since in the
> end there was no use for it (more than the description), no way to
> automatically validate data modeled with that AP.
Can you share some more information on the results of your interviews with regard to the developers' requirements?
Thanks,
Lars
______________________________________
> De: DCMI Architecture Forum <[log in to unmask]> em
> nome de Valentine Charles <[log in to unmask]>
> Enviado: 23 de julho de 2015 08:14
> Para: [log in to unmask]
> Assunto: Re: [RDF AP] Darwin Core, SHACL, and APs
>
> Hello Karen,
>
> I have looked at the Darwin Core documentation which is indeed very good
> and I looked at the SHACL document which I have to admit had lot of trouble
> to understand.
> My problem is that when I looked at the XML or RDF version of the Darwin
> Core I do understand the application profile and what I have to do. I think it is
> mostly due to the fact that it refers to a framework we are familiar with (such
> as DCAM). I was completely lost when I looked at SHACL.
> My feeling is that if a DC application profile is a particular implementation of
> SHACL it should provide the framework we are familiar with on top of SHACL.
> The framework might not be DCAM but I think it will be important to re-use
> some of the terminology. I think my main problem with SHACL is that I didn't
> understand the terminology and had therefore trouble to associate it with
> my EDM use case.
>
> My confusion might come the fact that I'm not so familiar with languages like
> SHACL but I thought I would share my thoughts with you.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Valentine
>
> ________________________________________
> From: DCMI Architecture Forum [[log in to unmask]] on
> behalf of Karen Coyle [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 22 July 2015 20:24
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [RDF AP] Darwin Core, SHACL, and APs
>
> I recently discovered Darwin Core[1], a sort of an extension of Dublin
> Core for biological data. It is well-documented, and has both RDF and
> XML versions. What struck me is that the XML version is based on DCAM
> and is essentially an application profile.
>
> We still have the question before us of whether we can create an AP in
> RDF. The issue (and it is one that is tormenting the W3C SHACL group as
> well) is how to define a bounded data set (aka: a record) using RDF.
> Assuming that the W3C group will resolve that, it may mean that we can
> use SHACL as the implementation language for an application profile, and
> that a DC application profile could be a particular implemention of SHACL.
>
> Thoughts? Comments?
>
> kc
> [1] http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/index.htm
> --
> Karen Coyle
> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
|