Thanks. I had no memory of these, so need to go back and read, but am
relieved that I agree with myself.
kc
On 7/7/15 4:51 AM, Jon Phipps wrote:
> Hi Karen,
>
> This is the telecon archive:
> http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/DCAM_Revision
>
> Your suggestion for moving forward (2012):
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1208&L=DC-ARCHITECTURE&F=&S=&P=59
>
> And this was my last suggestion:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1208&L=DC-ARCHITECTURE&F=&S=&P=847
>
> And your last word (apparently) on the subject before no more meetings
> were scheduled:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1208&L=DC-ARCHITECTURE&F=&S=&P=23798
>
> Jon
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> For those of you who skip over the RDF AP messages, the most recent
>> one had something of more general interest:
>>
>> >We discussed the possible relationship of our (future) application profile to SHACL. Our AP will need to go beyond RDF since we will have data that is not in RDF, including media files. We also see a need to define the graph that represents a whole "view" for a given application function. This is a role for a revised DCAP.
>>
>> >We also saw a particular barrier to our DCAP work due to the lack of a revision of DCAM to base our work on.
>>
>> I do recall that there was some work done on DCAM, but don't know
>> exactly where that ended. However, our work on DCAP will be difficult
>> if the DCAM revision has not taken place. So any info on that will be
>> welcome.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> kc
>>
>> --
>> Karen Coyle
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> http://kcoyle.net
>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
>
>
> --
> Jon
>
>
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
|