Hi Karen, hi all
although http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-dsp/ is a working draft,
this document is as far as I know the only document about the RDF serialization of DSP.
For each constraint, there is at least one example for an respective RDF representation.
I used these examples to define a not explicitly defined vocabulary.
This vocabulary can more or less be created completely out of these examples.
I did not write down this vocabulary in RDFS and OWL as I did not need to do this time-consuming task for the implementation of DSP.
I created various examples for each of these constraints for the RDF Validator:
http://rdfvalidator-rdfvalidation.rhcloud.com/rdfvalidator/dsp
On the 2. tab 'constraints', you can choose example constraints and you see how these constraints look like in RDF.
On the 3. tab 'data', you can select respective example data (valid data and invalid data).
On the 4. tab, you can click on 'Validate', and constraint violations triples are shown in case of invalid data.
For each constraint defined in the DSP document there is at least one concrete example in the validator.
If our group plans to further develop DSP, we could reuse the same validation environment if this is wished...
Cheers,
Thomas
Hi Karen,
Thomas took the RDF representation as illustrated here:
http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-dsp/
There seems to be nothing more, do you mean we should make this
serializtion more official? On the other hand the whole DSP document is
a working draft, so probably we rather should proceed to get beyond that
if we do anything about DSP.
Cheers,
Kai
Am 26.07.2015 um 23:38 schrieb Karen Coyle:
> Right, so I'm asking about that "serialization" which I assume resulted
> in an RDF vocabulary for DSP. In other words, properties, and perhaps
> classes, defined in RDF.
>
> kc
>
> On 7/26/15 2:06 PM, Kai Eckert wrote:
>> Karen,
>>
>> Am 26.07.2015 um 22:44 schrieb Karen Coyle:
>>> Kai, Thomas,
>>>
>>> is there an RDF vocabulary behind that that can be shared? I'm curious
>>> how close it adheres to DSP/DCAM.
>>>
>>> On 7/23/15 4:08 PM, Kai Eckert wrote:
>>>> BTW, Thomas has provided the long-missed implementation of DSP, so the
>>>> point of your interviewees is not valid anymore, at least for RDF data.
>>>
>>
>> I don't understand the question. I was referring to his work as
>> published at the last-year's DCMI conference, where he showed that a DSP
>> (serialized as RDF) can be mapped to SPIN so that RDF data can be
>> validated against it:
>>
>> http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3708
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Kai
>>
>
--
Prof. Dr. Kai Eckert, Stuttgart Media University
http://www.kaiec.org/
PGP Public Key: http://www.kaiec.org/2012/pgp/pubkey.asc
A987 3760 12A6 35A4 E6D2 577E 513A 6B84 C755 5A67
|