REMARK 2 is generated from
_refine.ls_d_res_high
http://mmcif.wwpdb.org/dictionaries/mmcif_pdbx_v40.dic/Items/_refine.ls_d_res_high.html
Regards
John
On Wednesday 08 July 2015 15:04:45 Jose Manuel Duarte wrote:
> This looks like the mapping you are after:
>
> http://mmcif.wwpdb.org/docs/pdb_to_pdbx_correspondences.html
>
> It maps only the structured PDB data items to their equivalent mmCIF
> items. For instance REMARK 2 is not there, but REMARK 200 is. The
> resolution value should then be in "REMARK 200 RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH"
> (corresponding to mmCIF data item _refine.ls_d_res_high).
>
> Jose
>
> On 07.07.2015 19:05, Phil Jeffrey wrote:
> > I'm updating some code to have limited mmCIF/PDB format
> > interoperability and have hit a snag. While I can infer the
> > connection between some data items in the PDB header REMARK and the
> > items in mmCIF I can't definitively deduce some others. In particular
> > the mapping of
> > REMARK 2 RESOLUTION
> > seems a little ambiguous and the dictionary documentation doesn't help
> > in this regard.
> >
> > Does anyone know where to find an explicit mapping of one data field
> > to another between the two formats ? (I don't expect there to be a
> > data field in the PDB header for everything in mmCIF but I do for the
> > reverse case).
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Phil Jeffrey
> > Princeton
>
--
John Berrisford
PDBe
European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
Hinxton
Cambridge CB10 1SD UK
Tel: +44 1223 492529
|