This looks like the mapping you are after:
http://mmcif.wwpdb.org/docs/pdb_to_pdbx_correspondences.html
It maps only the structured PDB data items to their equivalent mmCIF
items. For instance REMARK 2 is not there, but REMARK 200 is. The
resolution value should then be in "REMARK 200 RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH"
(corresponding to mmCIF data item _refine.ls_d_res_high).
Jose
On 07.07.2015 19:05, Phil Jeffrey wrote:
> I'm updating some code to have limited mmCIF/PDB format
> interoperability and have hit a snag. While I can infer the
> connection between some data items in the PDB header REMARK and the
> items in mmCIF I can't definitively deduce some others. In particular
> the mapping of
> REMARK 2 RESOLUTION
> seems a little ambiguous and the dictionary documentation doesn't help
> in this regard.
>
> Does anyone know where to find an explicit mapping of one data field
> to another between the two formats ? (I don't expect there to be a
> data field in the PDB header for everything in mmCIF but I do for the
> reverse case).
>
>
> Thanks
> Phil Jeffrey
> Princeton
|