Reply-To: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 8 Jul 2015 11:59:56 -0400491_utf-8 Thanks Jose - I missed that one.
REMARK 2 is somewhat ambiguous with: _refine.ls_d_res_high and _reflns.d_resolution_high
although the former makes more sense and seems to be what corresponds to REMARK 2. Haven't yet seen an entry with only _reflns.d_resolution_high and not _refine.ls_d_res_high but there are several where the resolution of refinement is apparently significantly higher than the resolution of the source data: 1AU7, 1AW7 etc. [...][log in to unmask] |