Excellent - that is fine.
If they are a person who hold a certificate then I don't mind whether they are
TBH nearly all the first 65 responses were different, very little duplication so I was a little concerned when suddenly
we had so many looking like they'd been cut+pasted. But consistency is good - it is easier for me to collate :-)
BTW if you have 400 host certificates, please don't do 400 entries, one for each host - that wouldn't be useful :-)
Cheers and thanks again
JK
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Matt Doidge
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 12:11 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Multiple entries in CA User Survey
>
> Hi John,
> This might be entries from Lancaster - a message was sent around our hep
> group's mailing list encouraging people to fill in the survey, and those
> are the example entries given - to the letter. It looks like people were
> copying and pasting their responses from the mail.
>
> So if my hunch is correct they're still legitimate entries (from atlas
> and t2k members at Lancaster who need and use grid certificates). Well
> some might be from postgrads, do they count? :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
>
> On 17/06/15 11:21, John Kewley wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Can I ask if someone has had technology issues or as deliberately done
> multiple entries in the CA User survey you may have seen:
> > https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/DS7DCBV
> >
> > There were a lot of entries on Fri->Mon for
> > Community: "UK particle physics"
> > and then for "main project":
> > 8x "ATLAS"
> > and
> > 9x "T2K"
> >
> > If anyone knows anything about this can they let me know so I can try and
> work what the intent of this is.
> >
> > PS if you haven't yet filled in this survey then feel free to fill it in.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > JK
> >
|