Hi there, colleagues
thanks.
Since asked, my reply then goes:
such a data submission (=huge, no relevant metadata to understand
anything), and with such an argumentation (=manuscript not submitted
yet) is utterly unacceptable.
Reject, and try again.
That's what I would say; compromises cannot be made much here.
Kindly
Falk Huettmann
On 6/4/15, Khokhar, Masud <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that most of us have started receiving datasets, what are you doing in
> terms of quality checking of data? We have just received a large zip file of
> data which consists of about 200MB+ of .log files. Without knowing the
> research behind the data (data is often submitted before the publication),
> we can't really say whether these log files are by product of data or actual
> data itself.
>
> We also don't want to go back to the researchers with all these questions,
> they are already annoyed enough.
>
> Any ideas/tips/tricks/sharing of experience highly appreciated.
>
> Best wishes,
> Masud
>
> --
> Masud Khokhar
> Head of Digital Innovation
> Lancaster University Library
> Lancaster University,
> LA1 4YH, Lancaster, United Kingdom
>
> Tel: +44 (0)1524 5-94236 | Email:
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> |
> Twitter: @mkhokhar
>
>
|