Hello MCG
Are any members aware of any standard approaches to recording the veracity of linked data assertions, especially if made by the General Public.
For example, on a crowd source project where users are writing stories, we want them to add links to persons. However, the story
might be the "absolute truth" , "believed to be the truth" , "anecdotal" or anywhere on this range. So the record externally linked
may, or may not be, 100%.
By enforcing that the LD must be 100% correct, we are concerned that it creates a potential barrier to engagement with it.
Are any members involved in projects that manage linked open data in the GLAM space that also record the "truthiness" of the LD,
and does there exist a "scoring" model in our sector?
Thanks
--
James Grimster
Orangeleaf Systems Ltd
01743 352000
www.orangeleaf.com
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
|