Hi Tiago,
From the photomicrographs these look like pretty typical low-P
granulites, a la Green & Ringwood 1966, and see my 1989 paper.
Pseudosection by all means, but remember the essentials of the basic
petrology.
Regards,
Simon
Quoting Pavel Pitra <[log in to unmask]> on Fri, 19 Jun 2015
01:09:42 +0200:
> Dear Tiago,
>
> in line with the message of Dimitry, I would guess pseudosections
> are the most suitable approach for these high variance assemblages.
> As an inspiration you may have a look on our work on granulites from
> western Africa, using a combination of avPT and pseudosections.
> Although the dominant assmeblage is a HP granulite one, the LP
> granulite overprint is dealt with as well:
>
> Pitra, P., Kouamelan, A. N., Ballèvre, M. & Peucat, J.-J., 2010.
> Palaeoproterozoic high-pressure granulite overprint of the Archean
> continental crust: evidence for homogeneous crustal thickening (Man
> Rise, Ivory Coast). Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 28, 41-58.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Pavel
>
>
****************************************
Simon Harley FRSE
Professor of Lower Crustal Processes
School of GeoSciences
University of Edinburgh
Grant institute, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FE
phone (0044) (0)131 650 4839
mobile (+44) 7889584904
email [log in to unmask]
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
|