All,
> This is great. I am just going to wait for completing the actions we've discussed
> at the call yesterday [1], and then will put in on the database (and our
> requirement list).
>
> A Corey pointed out in a separate email, it's worth noting that the requirement
> is exactly the same as the one expressed by Karen Coombs on the id.loc.gov
> mailing list:
> http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A1=ind1506&L=id&D=0&H=0&O=T&T=0
Perhaps I'm stupid, but I cannot read Nate's answers...
/Lars
|