Antoine - Corey and I are chatting about that in 1.5 hours. We can
answer after that. It is also being discussed in the W3C group because I
took it there. Back to you soon.
kc
On 6/2/15 7:04 AM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Hi Corey, Karen,
>
> This is to ask you about the status of
>
> [
> ACTION: Corey and Karen to write up cases of validation with
> de-referencing or local caches, to be sent to W3C
>
> Corey: I thought we had done.
> ... I had drafted something during a meeting
> ... I thought it had been sent and they were not very interested
> ... I will ask Karen for confirmation.
> ]
>
> We still have R-171 [1] and R-171bis [2], but I believe none of these
> were what Corey was after the last time [3]. It would be a pity to lose
> an important requirement.
>
> Apparently Corey had written a short description at [4]
> [
> My question for the W3C group is whether their definition of "instance
> data" includes local caches of remote resources. Example of LCSH on
> id.loc.gov. Over 480,000 skos concepts represented, of which I may need
> 10,000 in a local system, so I will use a separate triplestore or
> something like Linked Data Fragments to cache. I have validation needs
> around dereferencing these and confirming their shape. I also
> potentially have a validation need on when my cache is invalid .
> -- Partial answer: there is great discussion about how the Shapes
> standard will define the extent of the graph over which validation will
> take place. There is also discussion about extension mechanisms, e.g.
> the ability to call arbitrary routines.
> ]
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
> [1] http://lelystad.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/rdf-validation/?q=node/286
> [1] http://lelystad.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/rdf-validation/?q=node/455
> [3] https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/dcmi-ap-23-04-2015
> [4] https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/dcmi-ap-09-04-2015
>
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
|