Dear Guillaume,
Thanks for your swift reply. Unfortunately, even with mask (explicit
binary mask) my terminal stay in loop*, I 've yet exactly following the
VBM recipe of John Ashburner.
Do you have another idea?
Many thanks again,
Frederic
*
>> In spm_Tcdf at 91
>> In spm_ECdensity at 38
>> In spm_P_RF at 63
>> In spm_uc_RF at 38
>> In spm_uc at 31
>> In spm_getSPM at 783
>> In spm_results_ui at 261
Le 2015-05-21 21:37, Guillaume Flandin a écrit :
> Dear Frederic,
>
> you probably need to mask your data during model specification, see p17
> of John's document:
> http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/~john/misc/VBMclass15.pdf
>
> Best regards,
> Guillaume.
>
>
> On 21/05/15 16:00, briend wrote:
>> Dear SPM users,
>>
>> I have recently acquired SPM 12 to run a VBM analysis. My
>> preprocessing
>> (Segment, Run DARTEL –create Templates-, Normalise to MNI space) works
>> perfectly and my model for a between group comparison runs without any
>> problem as well. However after estimate my SPM.mat file (Stats &
>> factorial design specification> 2 samples t-test), I have a bug in the
>> Results: I have my contrast (-1 1), I don’t apply a mask, and don’t
>> proceed to FEW, then the problem begin, my terminal seems to play in
>> loop:
>>
>> Warning: Returning NaN for out of range arguments
>> In spm_Tcdf at 91
>> In spm_ECdensity at 38
>> In spm_P_RF at 63
>> In spm_uc_RF at 38
>> In spm_uc at 31
>> In spm_getSPM at 783
>> In spm_results_ui at 261
>>
>> Could anyone suggest what could be the source of the problem and how
>> to
>> solve it?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance,
>>
>> Frederic
>>
|