Antoine
> Thanks for the answer!
>
> June 18 would be alright.
OK, then I'll try to put something together until that call.
> As far as I can tell the group doesn't have an official input on your question.
> Truth is, there was no champion for making that issue explicit - or it was
> forgotten in the maelstrom of new requirements that came after and/or
> merged with them.
At least it was documented... [1] , but yes, there is no hint that we actually _did_ something of that user story [2]. I definitely confess that I haven't been very active in the group and also have not really looked after my use case.
> This is indeed quite ironic, given the original context for the group's creation.
> But if you submit some description of the case, we'd be certainly happy to
> oblige add it to our lists!
I'd be happy to oblige. What exactly do I need to do?
[1] http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/RFC-6906-Profiles
[2] http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php?title=RDF-Application-Profiles#Use_Cases_and_Requirements
Cheers,
Lars
> On 5/22/15 10:31 AM, Svensson, Lars wrote:
> > Hi Antoine,
> >
> >> In the past two weeks there's been a discussion about Linked Data Profiles
> on
> >> the W3C public linked open data list:
> >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2015May/thread.html
> ("Profiles
> >> in Linked Data")
> >>
> >> It looks relevant, and it's a very long thread!
> >
> > Yes I started that thread with the goal of finding consensus on how clients and
> servers can negotiate profiles (or shapes or whatever-we-prefer-to-call-them).
> The use case I have is the provision of bibliographic data in several "profiles", e.
> g. BIBFRAME, RDA/FRBR, etc. There hasn't been a clear answer yet...
> >
> >> Lars, you have started it, would it be possible for you to report on it in one of
> >> the coming bi-weekly calls of the RDF AP group?
> >
> > I could present/report on June 18 if that is a suitable date. June 4 is a public
> holiday in this part of Germany so I shall not be able to attend that meeting.
> >
> >> At the call today, we were quite curious to hear whether you think there's
> >> something we should do!
> >
> > If I remember correctly, Kai kicked off this working group after my
> presentation at SWIB in 2013 where I mentioned the need for profile
> negotiation, so perhaps I should ask the wg members if you have any input!
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Lars
> >
> >
|