Did anyone attempt this questionnaire? I gave it 5 minutes then gave up
on it. I'm wondering if anyone had a different experience.
kc
On 4/15/15 5:01 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> On 4/15/15 2:44 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>
>>> But it gives me an idea, if you don't mind us stealing
>>> yours, which is that DCMI (which is working now to come up with a
>>> set of "core" validation requirements) could do a "plain language"
>>> questionnaire for our GLAM colleagues on validation needs. That
>>> would also help us define our priorities.
>>
>> It uses a few scripts (
>> perl CGI backend to record submissions on the server,
>> a bit of js to query the backend and autofill previous answers,
>> and some glitzy stuff to inspire epileptic seizures
>> ). Do you need that stuff?
>
>
> No, I think we could just use natural language questions, like:
> "Are some of your elements mandatory? Are some of your elements
> repeatable? Do you need to create limits like "A or B" in which it is
> either A or B but not both? "... in which you can use both A and B if
> you wish".... etc.
>
> Amazing, isn't it, that you can do all of that with such ancient
> technology?
>
> :-)
>
> kc
>
>>
>>
>>> kc
>>>
>>> On 4/15/15 10:09 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>>> In some Mayo grant work, I have prepared a questionnaire on the
>>>> expressivity of shape expressions. It presents a high-level language
>>>> for expressing RDF constraints, explains a number of the technical
>>>> points, and asks the user for which features and technical approaches
>>>> are important to their work and their view of what will make the
>>>> language successful. There are a couple places where you can click for
>>>> extra geekiness, in case the baseline geekiness was insufficient.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like people to fill out the form imagining their immediate uses
>>>> for RDF validation as well as those that may come with new markets
>>>> enabled by the existence of such RDF validating tooling. The form will
>>>> record your results whenever you hit submit so you can easily revisit
>>>> your answers after reflection.
>>>>
>>>> This work is supported in part by a NIH U01 grant – caCDE-QA
>>>> (1U01CA180940-01A1).
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Karen Coyle
>>> [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
>>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>>> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
>>
>
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
|