On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:15:17 +0000, Keller, Jacob <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>I have processed test data sets (measured at the SLS) which have only a few non-zero pixels on each frame. Can be nicely integrated - but it was insulin.
>What were the values of the non-zero pixels, I wonder? How many total counts per image? And this was, I assume, Pilatus? Sounds pretty amazing, even for insulin...
>JPK
Pilatus 2M. This is the histogram of a random frame I picked:
counts number
0 2211457 thus 97% of all pixels have zero counts
1 65154 that's 2.8% of all pixels
2 2107
3 96
4 20
5 12
6 3
7 5
9 2
10 2
11 3
12 4
14 2
15 1
29 1
all other counts are zero. The average count is 0.03. Processing was done with the March-2015 version of XDS; older versions do not work well with average counts below about 0.5 .
best,
Kay
|