> On 24 Feb 2015, at 10:58, Daniela Bauer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> A check on squid registrations in GOCDB suggests this needs to be done for: UCL, Birmingham, Durham, IC and Sussex.
>
> Simon argues the squid is an internal service and therefore no-ones business. Maybe some one who is not me can argue the finer points with him ? (It would be nice though if the WLCG would stop monitoring for monitoring's sake and no, I don't want a package reporter either.)
I think monitoring functionality (can I get this file via cvmfs? can I get this file via HTTP?) rather than services is always better if possible, since it’s less intrusive about how the site decides to organise itself.
Cheers
Andrew
--
Dr Andrew McNab, High Energy Physics,
University of Manchester, UK, M13 9PL.
Skype and Google Talk: andrew.mcnab.uk
Web: www.hep.manchester.ac.uk/u/mcnab
|