But that suggests they're of a mind and it is unlikely that they are
I can't see the problem with "its"
L
On 18 February 2015 at 16:07, Max Richards <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> mmm...
> or
> 'both taking our'?
>
> M
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:45, Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > I wonder why. Seems to me to be the right word there; preferable to
> their;
> > and there's an irregular repetition of the short i which I find pleasing
> >
> > L
> >
> > On 18 February 2015 at 15:31, Max Richards <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Oh yes, but I'd reconsider the word 'its'/
> >>
> >> [definition of reciprocity:
> >>
> >> you attend my funeral -
> >>
> >> I'll attend yours.]
> >>
> >> Max
> >>
> >> On Feb 18, 2015, at 3:19, Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Let us, together, do gardening,
> >>>
> >>> each giving their contribution
> >>>
> >>> with no stint; each taking its own
> >>>
> >>> idea of pleasure without pause.
> >>>
> >>> It's cooperation, I want,
> >>>
> >>> with mutuality desired.
> >>
>
|