In http://www.w3.org/2015/02/shapes-article/ , I attempt to clarify
the common ground between the shapes vs. classes debate. I'd like
feedback from the DC folks on whether this fits your models and
whether you would make use of the "record classes", and if so, whether
to add them as examples to a prospective shapes primer:
http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-primer/no-class-templates.html#associations
--
-ericP
office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
([log in to unmask])
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.
There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
|