Thanks, Antoine. This comparison is something I've been meaning to do.
We discussed requirements yesterday at the W3C meeting and made a few
changes. One requirement that seems to be missing is the ability to
effect validation using something other than rdf:type as a trigger. I'll
propose that as a requirement for W3C. I think I can get some help for
it since there is at least one other person here at the meeting who also
needs it.
kc
On 2/17/15 6:47 PM, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>> > ACTION: Stefanie & Antoine to interlink DCAP Reqs with W3C Reqs and
>> send result to W3C WG, after Karen and Tom have compiled the list of
>> requirements [NEW]
>>
>
>
> I've started to link the W3C requirements at
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Requirements
> with our requirements the DC AP requirements
> at
> http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/RDF_Application_Profiles/
>
> The process is the following:
> - I have started from the W3C requirements, and when I thought they were
> related to the DC AP one, I indicated it
> - the result appears in the DC AP requirement page (no time to do
> anything else!)
> - I have gone through sections 2.1-2.10 of the W3C requirement. Sorry I
> just didn't have enough time to continue. And the modularization section
> of the W3C requirement doesn't seem like the easiest one (though it's
> crucial!)
>
> Note that while doing this I found some problem with our requirements.
> Some bad requirements apparently slept through.
>
> I hope this helps.
> @Karen, I let you judge whether it is appropriate to communicate this to
> the W3C group. They may dislike the fact that our list is still not
> clean. But I thought I'd give it a try, still.
>
> I won't have time to continue this before several days so if anyone
> wants to continue (Stefanie?), feel free to do so!
>
> Best,
>
> Antoine
>
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
|