Thank you Nick
On 12 January 2015 at 11:44, Nick Poole <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Dear Arantza,
>
> The Collections Trust has been working with the PSI team at the National
> Archives on a guidance note for museums & cultural heritage organisations
> that they are producing, which will address your questions. We are also
> developing an FAQ, for publication in March, so if I may, I will take your
> questions and feed them into this.
>
> With best regards,
>
> Nick
>
> Nick Poole
> Chief Executive
> Collections Trust
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7942 6080
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>
> Join Collections Trust's Collections Management Group
> Follow us on Twitter
> Like us on Facebook
>
> www.collectionstrust.org.uk. Company Registration No: 1300565 Registered
> Charity No: 273984
> Registered Office: Collections Trust, WC 209, Natural History Museum,
> Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Arantza Barrutia-Wood
> Sent: 12 January 2015 10:49
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [MCG] Changes to the Re-use of Public Sector Information
>
> Hi
>
> I wonder if anyone has been looking at this and can help with a few
> queries. Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
>
> 1. Does the re-use of public information directive include *works of
> art and film *or only the written word in any format including film and
> audio?
>
> 2. Can parts of an archive collection fall outside the re-use
> directive under the exceptions of performing arts organisations and their
> archives?
>
> 3. How does the fair dealing clause affect value-added products? Will
> archives have to pay themselves for the use of their own holdings from now
> on? Can we consider in kind return as a form of payment? What is the
> definition of equivalent product? Will the directive be retrospective and
> affect added-value products that have been created before its
> implementation in 2015?
>
> 4. Is permitting re-use still not mandatory? And can the organisation
> decide whether to adhere to the rules or not? The 2010 Impact Assessment
> document written by the National Archive states that for museums, libraries
> and archives the discretion over whether to permit re-use remains.
>
> 5. On the matter of licences for the re-use of public sector
> information, the Guidelines on recommended standard licences estates that
> ‘it is *ADVISABLE *for licences to cover attribution requirements only, as
> any obligations may limit licensees’ creativity or economic activity,
> thereby affecting the re-use potential of the documents in question. (is it
> law? Can we impose restrictions to the exploitation of the material even
> though this is not recommended?)
>
> 6. Do we have to contact the Treasury in order to charge a fee?
>
> 7. Does the RPI apply to EU Countries only or internationally?
> Thank you
> --
> Arantza Barrutia-Wood
> Collections Officer
> University of Sheffield
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ****************************************************************
> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> ****************************************************************
>
> ****************************************************************
> website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
> [un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
> ****************************************************************
>
--
Arantza Barrutia-Wood
Collections Officer
University of Sheffield
[log in to unmask]
****************************************************************
website: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/ukmcg
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/museumscomputergroup
[un]subscribe: http://museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email-list/
****************************************************************
|