CALL FOR APPLICATIONS
The Finnish National Graduate Programme in Development Studies (DEVESTU)
is calling for applications for a three-day international research
workshop around the theme of POSTDEVELOPMENT AS PARADIGM?
When?
June 8 – 10, 2015
Where?
University of Helsinki, Finland
Who for?
Doctoral candidates, post-doctoral researchers and senior scholars in
Development Studies
Speakers
Arturo Escobar, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
Wendy Harcourt, Erasmus University Rotterdam, NL
Olivia Rutazibwa, University of Portsmouth, UK
Farhana Sultana, University of Syracuse, USA
Application deadline
March 31, 2015
(application details below and more info in
http://www.kehitystutkimus.fi/Postdevelopment_as_paradigm_CFA.pdf)
Background
As our planet’s governments engage with the definition of a ‘post-2015
development agenda’, and as the Finnish National Graduate Programme in
Development Studies (DEVESTU) approaches the end of its career, time
feels ripe for an assessment of the impact of post-developmental
critique (eg. Escobar 1992, 2000; Latouche 1993) on the perceptions,
politics and practices of development (and development studies).
Such an assessment takes place in a context defined by a number of
striking factors. These include widespread recognition that
the modernization project that has provided the normative
scaffolding to the global development industry is complicit in
deepening social polarization on a global scale, as well as in
irreversible changes in our planet’s bio-physical and ecological
conditions.
the accelerated unravelling of Northern hegemony in the wake of the
2008 global fiscal crisis which catalyzed the emergence of several
Southern powers (the BRICS, in general and China most prominently),
has spearheaded an assertive challenge to the legitimacy of a
Eurocentric understanding of development; and
the political trends in international development are evidenced by
such contradictory elements as the proliferation of corporate claims
to ‘social responsibility,’ and the accession to state power of
political entities which question the legitimacy, not only of ‘Western
hegemony’, but of capitalist modernity itself.
These trends form the backdrop for a concerted attempt, involving a
broad spectrum of governmental, private and civil society
organizations, to formulate a new global agenda for the development
industry which simultaneously seeks to embrace the principles of
universality and pluralism.
Post-developmental critique anticipated some of these shifts and
transitions in the global political economy. At the same time many of
the precepts of earlier post-developmental critiques have resurfaced
within the ideological mainstream within which public policy debates
about the contours of international development agendas are taking
shape. As Tariq Banuri (2013) notes, “it is remarkable how … seemingly
radical ideas have now become the new orthodoxy.” The patchy success
of the MDGs - or better, their decided lack of success in addressing
the key structural ills of growing inequality and deteriorating
environmental justice – has (again) raised demands for a radical
rethinking of ‘development’.
One might then ask what ‘post-development’ has provided for a new
generation of development thinking (both academic and pragmatic). To
the extent that aspects of post-developmentalism are indeed implicated
in some approaches to post-2015 thinking, one might be moved to
inquire not only about the radical potential of post-developmental
ideas today, but also as to their political currency. To what extent
have post-developmental principles found political resonance among
actors at various levels of resolution: grassroots activists, national
political platforms, global social movements?
Arturo Escobar, in a new preface (2012) to his post-developmental
classic Encountering development (orig. 1995) offers a rich
problematization of the contemporary scope and validity of the
post-development debates. Escobar notes that profound shifts in the
global landscape necessitate a rethinking of post-developmentalism as
an intellectual project. He nevertheless reaffirms the validity of
post-development critique, and indeed suggests that deepening
environmental crisis and the ongoing reconfiguration of international
relations render it timelier than ever. Escobar gives particular
weight to the political ascendency of Latin American indigenous
movements whose ‘relational ontologies’ and ‘alternative cosmovisions’
- encapsulated in the Andean notion of Bien Vivir, or Living Well -
create real political space for ‘an ethics of development that
subordinates economic objectives to ecological criteria, human
dignity, and social justice’ (Escobar 2012: xxvi).
Left and indigenous political shifts in Latin America may well herald
the beginnings of a revolutionary transition in both the theory and
practice of development. But revolutionary upheavals, as Hannah Arendt
(1963) has shown, seldom beget self-perpetuating revolutionary
institutions. As radical transitions settle into everyday arts of
government, pre-existing conventions and arrangements often reassert
themselves. Is this the fate of post-developmental values? Can and
will the ‘pluriversal’ logics of post-development find the momentum,
appeal and political leverage points that might, over time, convert an
itinerant ethics of development into social, political and economic
practices genuinely aligned with diversity, dignity and justice?
There are, then, quite fundamental questions at stake when considering
the status of the post-developmental project as a new development
paradigm. Indeed, such an inquiry obliges us to ask: If and when
radical ideas of the past are incorporated into a new orthodoxy, what
happens to the space of critique, the possibility for critical
imaginaries?
The workshop
The workshop will bring together PhD students as well as more
established scholars, supervisors, and guests associated with the
evolution of critical development studies concerned with the state of
international development and its critical analysis.
The programme features keynote talks and breakout group debates. Talks
will be presented by a stellar group of post-development scholars,
including Arturo Escobar, whose seminal work Encountering development
(1995) is widely regarded as the foundation text of the
post-developmental movement; Wendy Harcourt, instrumental in
championing many progressive debates in international development
circles as the long-term editor of the journal Development; Olivia
Rutazibwa, a vocal critic of racialized injustice; and Farhana
Sultana, a critical geographer strongly engaged with revitalizing
development studies.
Discussions in small breakout groups will be based on background
readings and the keynote talks. These debates will deepen the debates
and provide an opportunity for more intensive engagement with the
workshop theme and with co-participants in the workshop.
Participation is by invitation on the basis of a written application.
The number of participants will be limited to 30 to enable fruitful
and inclusive discussions throughout the workshop. To apply, please
send a file in pdf format to Ms. Karen Heikkilä at
<kfheikki(at)mappi.helsinki.fi> by March 31, 2015.
The application should include
applicant’s name and status (e.g., doctoral student, post-doc…)
applicant’s institutional affiliation
a brief (max 250 word) motivational letter
a brief (max 50 word) summary of the applicant’s main research interests
doctoral students and post-docs should substitute the previous item
with a brief (max 500 word) summary of their current research project.
Please address inquiries to Karen Heikkilä <kfheikki(at)mappi.helsinki.fi>.
--
Paola Minoia, PhD in Human Geography
Adj Prof in Development Geography
Senior Lecturer in Development and Tourism Geography
Geography Unit, Department of Geosciences and Geography
University of Helsinki, Finland
ph +358 (0)294151638
cell +358 (0)503175576
Chief Editor: Fennia - International Journal of Geography
http://www.helsinki.fi/maantiede/geofi/fennia/
|