JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  January 2015

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM January 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

International workshop on postdevelopment, Helsinki 8-10 June 2015

From:

Paola Minoia <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:14:41 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (177 lines)

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS

The Finnish National Graduate Programme in Development Studies (DEVESTU)

is calling for applications for a three-day international research  
workshop around the theme of POSTDEVELOPMENT AS PARADIGM?

When?
June 8 – 10, 2015

Where?
University of Helsinki, Finland

Who for?
Doctoral candidates, post-doctoral researchers and senior scholars in  
Development Studies

Speakers
Arturo Escobar, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
Wendy Harcourt, Erasmus University Rotterdam, NL
Olivia Rutazibwa, University of Portsmouth, UK
Farhana Sultana, University of Syracuse, USA

Application deadline
March 31, 2015
(application details below and more info in  
http://www.kehitystutkimus.fi/Postdevelopment_as_paradigm_CFA.pdf)

Background

As our planet’s governments engage with the definition of a ‘post-2015  
development agenda’, and as the Finnish National Graduate Programme in  
Development Studies (DEVESTU) approaches the end of its career, time  
feels ripe for an assessment of the impact of post-developmental  
critique (eg. Escobar 1992, 2000; Latouche 1993) on the perceptions,  
politics and practices of development (and development studies).

Such an assessment takes place in a context defined by a number of  
striking factors. These include widespread recognition that

	the modernization project that has provided the normative  
scaffolding to the global development industry is complicit in  
deepening social polarization on a global scale, as well as in  
irreversible changes in our planet’s bio-physical and ecological  
conditions.

	the accelerated unravelling of Northern hegemony in the wake of the  
2008 global fiscal crisis which catalyzed the emergence of several  
Southern powers (the BRICS, in general and China most prominently),  
has spearheaded an assertive challenge to the legitimacy of a  
Eurocentric understanding of development; and

	the political trends in international development are evidenced by  
such contradictory elements as the proliferation of corporate claims  
to ‘social responsibility,’ and the accession to state power of  
political entities which question the legitimacy, not only of ‘Western  
hegemony’, but of capitalist modernity itself.

These trends form the backdrop for a concerted attempt, involving a  
broad spectrum of governmental, private and civil society  
organizations, to formulate a new global agenda for the development  
industry which simultaneously seeks to embrace the principles of  
universality and pluralism.

Post-developmental critique anticipated some of these shifts and  
transitions in the global political economy. At the same time many of  
the precepts of earlier post-developmental critiques have resurfaced  
within the ideological mainstream within which public policy debates  
about the contours of international development agendas are taking  
shape. As Tariq Banuri (2013) notes, “it is remarkable how … seemingly  
radical ideas have now become the new orthodoxy.” The patchy success  
of the MDGs - or better, their decided lack of success in addressing  
the key structural ills of growing inequality and deteriorating  
environmental justice – has (again) raised demands for a radical  
rethinking of ‘development’.

One might then ask what ‘post-development’ has provided for a new  
generation of development thinking (both academic and pragmatic). To  
the extent that aspects of post-developmentalism are indeed implicated  
in some approaches to post-2015 thinking, one might be moved to  
inquire not only about the radical potential of post-developmental  
ideas today, but also as to their political currency. To what extent  
have post-developmental principles found political resonance among  
actors at various levels of resolution: grassroots activists, national  
political platforms, global social movements?

Arturo Escobar, in a new preface (2012) to his post-developmental  
classic Encountering development (orig. 1995) offers a rich  
problematization of the contemporary scope and validity of the  
post-development debates. Escobar notes that profound shifts in the  
global landscape necessitate a rethinking of post-developmentalism as  
an intellectual project. He nevertheless reaffirms the validity of  
post-development critique, and indeed suggests that deepening  
environmental crisis and the ongoing reconfiguration of international  
relations render it timelier than ever. Escobar gives particular  
weight to the political ascendency of Latin American indigenous  
movements whose ‘relational ontologies’ and ‘alternative cosmovisions’  
- encapsulated in the Andean notion of Bien Vivir, or Living Well -  
create real political space for ‘an ethics of development that  
subordinates economic objectives to ecological criteria, human  
dignity, and social justice’ (Escobar 2012: xxvi).
Left and indigenous political shifts in Latin America may well herald  
the beginnings of a revolutionary transition in both the theory and  
practice of development. But revolutionary upheavals, as Hannah Arendt  
(1963) has shown, seldom beget self-perpetuating revolutionary  
institutions. As radical transitions settle into everyday arts of  
government, pre-existing conventions and arrangements often reassert  
themselves. Is this the fate of post-developmental values? Can and  
will the ‘pluriversal’ logics of post-development find the momentum,  
appeal and political leverage points that might, over time, convert an  
itinerant ethics of development into social, political and economic  
practices genuinely aligned with diversity, dignity and justice?
There are, then, quite fundamental questions at stake when considering  
the status of the post-developmental project as a new development  
paradigm. Indeed, such an inquiry obliges us to ask: If and when  
radical ideas of the past are incorporated into a new orthodoxy, what  
happens to the space of critique, the possibility for critical  
imaginaries?


The workshop

The workshop will bring together PhD students as well as more  
established scholars, supervisors, and guests associated with the  
evolution of critical development studies concerned with the state of  
international development and its critical analysis.

The programme features keynote talks and breakout group debates. Talks  
will be presented by a stellar group of post-development scholars,  
including Arturo Escobar, whose seminal work Encountering development  
(1995) is widely regarded as the foundation text of the  
post-developmental movement; Wendy Harcourt, instrumental in  
championing many progressive debates in international development  
circles as the long-term editor of the journal Development; Olivia  
Rutazibwa, a vocal critic of racialized injustice; and Farhana  
Sultana, a critical geographer strongly engaged with revitalizing  
development studies.

Discussions in small breakout groups will be based on background  
readings and the keynote talks. These debates will deepen the debates  
and provide an opportunity for more intensive engagement with the  
workshop theme and with co-participants in the workshop.

Participation is by invitation on the basis of a written application.  
The number of participants will be limited to 30 to enable fruitful  
and inclusive discussions throughout the workshop. To apply, please  
send a file in pdf format to Ms. Karen Heikkilä at  
<kfheikki(at)mappi.helsinki.fi> by March 31, 2015.

The application should include

	applicant’s name and status (e.g., doctoral student, post-doc…)

	applicant’s institutional affiliation

	a brief (max 250 word) motivational letter

	a brief (max 50 word) summary of the applicant’s main research interests

	doctoral students and post-docs should substitute the previous item  
with a brief (max 500 word) summary of their current research project.

Please address inquiries to Karen Heikkilä <kfheikki(at)mappi.helsinki.fi>.


-- 
Paola Minoia, PhD in Human Geography
Adj Prof in Development Geography
Senior Lecturer in Development and Tourism Geography
Geography Unit, Department of Geosciences and Geography
University of Helsinki, Finland
ph +358 (0)294151638
cell +358 (0)503175576

Chief Editor: Fennia - International Journal of Geography
http://www.helsinki.fi/maantiede/geofi/fennia/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager