Hello,
concerning case (2) that I mentioned, I copied some material regarding
the second case-study I mentioned to this post:
http://www-st.inf.tu-dresden.de/semvis/blog/?p=332
Please note it was not written with the purpose to describe a case-study
for this group, but to discuss the pros and cons of various options I
identified for prescribing a schema for the RVL vocabulary. The focus
back then was more on discussing whether or not to use technologies from
the meta-modelling technical space (where prescriptive schemata are usual).
I added a summary of the use-cases and requirements at the end of the
post and also started to relate the requirements to the existing use
cases and requirements in the rdf-validation database (WIP). While some
of the requirements in the database may lack classification as "UI
support", I couldn't find many if any requirements not yet in the
database. (Which is great, I think!) So this case-study can probably not
add more requirements, but confirms some existing ones.
Cheers,
Jan
On 14.01.2015 18:41, Karen Coyle wrote:
> We could look at them (pls send links) and see if anything strikes us as
> being missing from our current list. After that we might answer your
> question. :-)
>
> kc
>
> On 1/14/15 8:40 AM, Bosch, Thomas wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> the DCMI AP working group is now in the last phase deriving RDF validation requirements from DC case studies and use cases.
>> I think it is not too late to add your case studies to our database.
>> Do others think it is worth to add these case studies to the database?
>>
>> You already have an account?
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> being interested in the Application-Profiles activities from the beginning, unfortunately I didn’t find the time during the last year to actually contribute. In case it’s too late now to contribute case-studies, please just tell me. In case it’s not, I could maybe add two use cases:
>>
>> 1) a first one deriving from my work on the d:swarm data integration tool at SLUB Dresden, where we have a related approach to define local views on "mixed vocabulary-schemas" in our schema mapping UI (I noticed the UI-Support section is still empty)
>>
>> 2) a second case-study from my phd at TU Dresden where I was looking for a mechanism to prescribe the allowed use of an RDF-based vocabulary (a declarative visualization „language“ inspired by Fresnel). I collected some requirements for this some time ago after realizing that OWL is not the way to go and still I didn’t want to leave the „Semantic-Web Technological space“ and use meta-modellling, EMF etc.
>>
>> If you are interested in one or both case-studies or you think the second one doesn’t fit, please let me know. I just requested for an account.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jan Polowinski
>>
|