Hi Jan,
the DCMI AP working group is now in the last phase deriving RDF validation requirements from DC case studies and use cases.
I think it is not too late to add your case studies to our database.
Do others think it is worth to add these case studies to the database?
You already have an account?
Thank you very much.
Cheers,
Thomas
Hello,
being interested in the Application-Profiles activities from the beginning, unfortunately I didn’t find the time during the last year to actually contribute. In case it’s too late now to contribute case-studies, please just tell me. In case it’s not, I could maybe add two use cases:
1) a first one deriving from my work on the d:swarm data integration tool at SLUB Dresden, where we have a related approach to define local views on "mixed vocabulary-schemas" in our schema mapping UI (I noticed the UI-Support section is still empty)
2) a second case-study from my phd at TU Dresden where I was looking for a mechanism to prescribe the allowed use of an RDF-based vocabulary (a declarative visualization „language“ inspired by Fresnel). I collected some requirements for this some time ago after realizing that OWL is not the way to go and still I didn’t want to leave the „Semantic-Web Technological space“ and use meta-modellling, EMF etc.
If you are interested in one or both case-studies or you think the second one doesn’t fit, please let me know. I just requested for an account.
Best regards,
Jan Polowinski
|