Isn't it well known that the accounting portal has never handled multicore jobs properly?
Regards,
Andrew.
________________________________
From: Alessandra Forti [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:23 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Fwd: Multicore accounting
Dear UK sites,
could you also go through this exercise please and check the accounting numbers are correct for your site? I particular I see few blue boxes in the efficiency [1] (i.e. CPUtime> walltime)
Have all CREAM-CE sites enabled the multicore support (see below)?
The CESGA portal maybe the problem as PIC is stating but I'd like to iron out any misconfiguration before.
thanks
cheers
alessandra
[1] http://tinyurl.com/kwlwang
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Multicore accounting
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:06:58 +0000
From: Alessandra Forti <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>
To: WLCG Multicore Deployment TF <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>, Rob Quick <[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Dear all,
this is another thread we need to check. We have receipes to enable
accounting for CREAM CEs and ARC-CEs should be working out of the box,
but I'd like sites to check their status. There seem to be some
discrepancies at some sites. We'd like to understand where they are
coming from i.e. have the sites published all the data? Have they
enabled the multicore counting in CREAM-CE [1]? Is it a portal problem?
Next week we have been asked to report at the WLCG MB about this so any
info about discrepancies we need to investigate (or also if it works
perfectly) you can send us is much appreciated.
thanks
cheers
alessandra
[1]
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/MulticoreTFReports#Report_18_09_2014
--
Respect is a rational process.
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|