JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EMBODIMENT Archives


EMBODIMENT Archives

EMBODIMENT Archives


EMBODIMENT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EMBODIMENT Home

EMBODIMENT Home

EMBODIMENT  November 2014

EMBODIMENT November 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Intimate Citizenship and Competing Sexual Rights Claims and Justice in the 21st Century

From:

Paul reynolds <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Interdisciplinary discussion on human embodiment <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:01:39 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (42 lines)

Second Call for Contributions/Chapters and Workshop Participation on

Intimate Citizenship and Competing Sexual Rights Claims and Justice
in the 21st Century

Thursday 16th April & Friday 17th April 2015
Edge Hill University, UK

Organised by the
International Network for Sexual Ethics and Politics (INSEP)

Over recent years, there have been significant advances in sexual rights internationally, particularly in Europe, North America and Australasia. Not only is there a greater recognition of sexual and gender diversity, but this recognition is manifest in revisions to national and international law and policy. As a result, people with non-heteronormative sexualities are enjoying and exercising legally protected civil, social, political and cultural rights previously denied to them. These developments might be characterised in terms of, what Plummer (1995: p.151) has called intimate citizenship, “the control (or not) over one’s body, feelings, relationships: access (or not) to representations, relationships, public spaces, etc: and socially grounded choices (or not) about gender identities”. Central to Plummer’s notion of intimate citizenship is the telling of sexual stories, the making public of what was previously private and intimate. However, whilst new stories have emerged, they have not eclipsed the old stories based on pathology and prejudice. Instead, they must sit side by side and attempt to navigate their way through fundamental and, at times, irreconcilable, differences.

These differences mean that the formal terms of changing law and policy have variable limits in how they impact on the social, cultural and political contexts within which people with non-heteronormative sexualities work, live and engage with the public sphere, and different degrees of incursion on their intimate lives. Although Plummer (2001: p.243) sees cultural wars and moral conflicts and “the constant skirmish of (a) insider and outsider, (b) of traditional tribalism struggling against multicultural diversities, (c) of the need for dialogues across the seemingly impossible differences” as characteristic of intimate citizenship, it does raise questions over whose rights are protected and which sexual stories are legitimated or prioritised.  These differences include (not exhaustively):

•	Claims of conscience in rejecting equal treatment in respect of lesbian and gay adoption and faith-based adoption agencies.
•	The toleration of anti-lesbian and gay rhetoric from religious voices
•	The criminalisation of HIV transmission without similar penalties for other sexually transmitted diseases
•	The scope and limits to the use of hate crime legislation and policy in bullying and harassment of people with non-heteronormative sexualities
•	The increased regulation of the production and consumption of pornography
•	The persistence of heterosexist assumptions in social care, health, policing and justice and education services
•	The persistence of prejudice and pathology of BDSM practices in the cultural, media and civil areas behind law and policy 
•	The limits and qualifications placed on transgender rights.
•	Dissonances in the framing of international and national law and policy and the actuality and cultural milieu of people's everyday lives
•	Sharp distinctions in the enjoyment of equality between those who embrace forms of homonormativity that do not challenge the culture and politics of heteronormativity, and queers who do. 

INSEP wishes to publish a coherent set of essays in this area, which marry theoretical enterprise, critical argumentation and empirical case studies. Publication may include a special edition of its journal - http://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/insep - and/or an edited collection in its new book series (or both) depending on the quality and coherence of the papers as a whole. For the journal, the normal double blind refereeing process would be in place and for the book and collegial refereeing and feedback system from editors and contributors would be in place.

We seek essays that focus on these tensions between existing and new rights claims and claims for justice, and which seek to develop dialogical and critical approaches to these tensions, but are open to whatever approaches a contributor wishes to engage with in order to achieve that, whether philosophical, or through literature, or through social, economic, cultural and/or political analyses. We especially welcome transdisciplinary approaches. 

The purpose of the workshop is to present and gain feedback on drafts of chapters/articles from a learned and invited audience with much time given to discussion and debate. We would anticipate only a small nominal charge to those attending to cover base costs (no more than £10-15), with delegates meeting their own travel and accommodation costs, though INSEP will affiliate with a letter of invitation that ties workshop participation together with publication. 

The project will be led by Allison Moore and Paul Reynolds from the Department of Social Sciences, Edge Hill University and the intention is to have publication of essays that meet quality thresholds by early 2016. Please send proposals for essays to Allison Moore at [log in to unmask] by Monday 12th January 2015 The timeline is:
•	Monday 12th January 2015 - expressions of interest in the form of 300 word abstracts, with name, affiliation and contact details
•	Monday 19th January 2015 - responses to expressions of interest
•	Thursday 16th April & Friday 17th April 2015 - opportunity to present draft essays at a two-day workshop at Edge Hill University to which contributors will be encouraged to attend/present
•	Friday 17th April 2015 - editors decisions communicated as to the form of the publication(s) - This will be discussed at the workshop. 
•	Monday 8th June 2015 - submission of draft essays. For the journal, essays will go through normal but expedited double blind peer review. For the book, essays will be refereed by other contributors and an editor. 
•	Early July 2015 - Return of feedback on drafts
•	Monday 21st September 2015 - submission of final drafts of essays
•	Publication - early 2016

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
November 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
March 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager