Hi,
This sounds also great to me, thanks for the offer, Thomas!
Echoing Karen's concern on the number of steps: after we agree for step 2, perhaps we can split the list of requirements to copy-and-deprecate, so that others can jump in.
Cheers,
Antoine
On 11/4/14 8:29 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Wow. I wish it didn't take so many steps, but I agree with your plan. If we can do this over email, and just confirm during the call, we save ourselves some call time.
>
> Antoine, does that sound good to you?
>
> kc
>
> On 11/4/14 9:36 AM, Bosch, Thomas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the next step could be to merge object and data property
>> requirements.
>>
>> I read the notes from the last call and there has been common consensus
>> that these requirements should be merged.
>>
>> We should collect ideas how to proceed here.
>>
>> My idea:
>>
>> 1.I could provide you a list with object and data property requirements
>> which could be merged
>>
>> 2.We decide for each pair or for all together if we want to merge them
>>
>> 3.I add ‘[deprecated]’ to one requirement of each requirement pair
>>
>> 4.We reorganize links to and from the deprecated requirements
>>
>> 5.We migrate definitions, descriptions, examples from deprecated
>> requirements
>>
>> 6.I delete deprecated requirements
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thomas Bosch, M.Sc. (TUM)
>>
>> PhD student
>>
>> GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
>>
>> Social Science Metadata Standards
>>
>> Visitors Address: B2,1, D-68159 Mannheim
>>
>> Postal Address: P.O.Box 12 21 55, D-68072 Mannheim
>>
>> Tel: + 49 (0) 621 / 1246-271
>>
>> Fax: + 49 (0) 621 / 1246-100
>>
>> Web: http://www.gesis.org <http://www.gesis.org/>
>>
>> Website: http://boschthomas.blogspot.com/
>>
>> GitHub: _https://github.com/boschthomas/PhD_
>>
>
|