Bill, I appreciate your question and statements I don't believe that you
are missing something. The context began as political. Millicent found new
meanings from there. I believe that those meanings hold. The "you" might
function as "an other," or equally (in my reading) as plural.
The ambiguity of my answer is not meant as a dodge. I recognize in your
points and what Millicent said that the openness does lead in at least two
different directions, either of which seems true (enough) :)
Thank you, Sheila
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Bill Wootton <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Sheila,
>
> I think I need some context here. I didn't, as Millicent clearly did, see
> a domestic situation.It seems more to be a political poem. But I may well
> be missing something. Wonder whether the 'you' is plural.
>
> Bill
>
>
> > On 21 Nov 2014, at 7:00 am, Sheila Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Here is who I am and what you are
> > distends all referendum
> > on finesse that channels
> > chattel, thus
> >
> > the pitfalls loom,
> > because we think
> > that way, and
> > I regret to say
> >
> > the homily we are about
> > to hear will wear out
> > and eventually
> > wear us home. All winter
> >
> > turns to referendum
> > on the statements
> > we would chant in sync
> > synthetically at least once.
> >
> > Sheila E. Murphy
> >
>
|