Hello,
Please find attached the first draft of the Q3 Northgrid report (minus a
few narratives). Please can people have a look at it - sorry for sending
it out so late on a Friday. If I don't hear anything in the next 45
minutes I'll send a copy to Jeremy - but I'll let him know it's only a
first draft.
Cheers,
Matt
On 10/17/2014 01:25 PM, Elena Korolkova wrote:
> Hi Matt
>
> We have
>
> cores: CE_LOGCPU=1064
> Benchmark 12.20-HEP-SPEC06
>
> Thanks
> Elena
>
> On 17 Oct 2014, at 12:18, Matt Doidge <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the update everyone - I knew gstat was on it's away out but I didn't realise how rubbish it had become.
>>
>> Elena, rebas and ggus are telling lies could you please send me the right figures, like Steve did for Liverpool.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>>
>> On 10/17/2014 11:49 AM, Elena Korolkova wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> by the way rebus gives incorrect numbers as well:
>>>
>>> http://wlcg-rebus.cern.ch/apps/capacities/sites/.
>>>
>>> I changed the numbers recently (as we added resources) but neither rebus or gstat reflect the change.
>>>
>>> Elena
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17 Oct 2014, at 11:20, Stephen Jones <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Matt,
>>>>
>>>> I believed that gstat is useless. There was something on TB_SUPPORT about
>>>> it, I thought.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, the "proper" values for Liverpool are:
>>>>
>>>>> SI2K
>>>>> Q2 Q3
>>>>> LIV 4337456 4336880
>>>>>
>>>>> CORES
>>>>>
>>>>> LIV 1384 1384
>>>>
>>>> I assume the 0.013% difference is a calculation error as the cores have
>>>> not changed.
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Everybody,
>>>>> Thanks to Steve for getting the Liverpool Narrative to me on time. I'm
>>>>> still putting together the report - as you know one of the columns is
>>>>> the gstat CPUs and SI2K for sites, to be obtained from gstat.
>>>>>
>>>>> But the numbers in gstat at the moment are lower then those from Q3 for
>>>>> everyone except Lancaster- is this expected? Perhaps an ARC CE
>>>>> publishing oddity? Or have sites been retiring kit? Or is gstat just
>>>>> being wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> SI2K
>>>>> Q2 Q3
>>>>> MAN 9666169 8920480
>>>>> LIV 4337456 2400960
>>>>> SHEF 2818080 1409040
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> CORES
>>>>>
>>>>> MAN 3958 3646
>>>>> LIV 1384 732
>>>>> SHEF 912 456
>>>>>
>>>>> (As you can see the CORES/SI2K proportions seem to remain the same).
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Matt
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/01/2014 10:31 AM, Matt Doidge wrote:
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>> Well Q3 disappeared in a flash - and it's quarterly report time again!
>>>>>> That means narratives need to be written. Could sites please get their
>>>>>> narratives to me by the 14th of October? That will give us a few days to
>>>>>> iron out any wrinkles before the report has to be in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>
|