JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACB-AKI-ALGORITHM Archives


ACB-AKI-ALGORITHM Archives

ACB-AKI-ALGORITHM Archives


ACB-AKI-ALGORITHM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACB-AKI-ALGORITHM Home

ACB-AKI-ALGORITHM Home

ACB-AKI-ALGORITHM  October 2014

ACB-AKI-ALGORITHM October 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Comment interpretation

From:

"Hill Robert (NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST)" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ACB AKI-Detection-Algorithm <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:50:43 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (110 lines)

Hi Jeff,

I assume that these are the comments that the CSC algorithm adds to the AKI Warning Stage Test result?
I do not know what the numbers mean - They may be used by CSC to define the situation encountered by the algorithm that led to the" positive" AKI test report.
CSC did not consult us on the detail of the comment output for their algorithm although I can guess what these comments are meant to convey.
It would seem better for the test result to express the stage of AKI as a numerical (dimensionless) result and allow flexibility in the accompanying comment.

You are one of the first to see the new CSC module in action (assuming it is indeed the new module) so there is little experience to share at the moment unless anyone else would care to comment?

Best wishes,

Robert

Dr Robert Hill
Consultant Clinical Biochemist
________________________________________
From: ACB AKI-Detection-Algorithm [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Barron [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 26 October 2014 18:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Comment interpretation

Dear Robert

We are implementing the AKI algorithm.
Your advice on the comments would be appreciated. What is the meaning of the numbers in brackets? Is there a detailed interpretation of the comments.
Have you kept the comments or changed the comments:
AKI stage 0 Report without alert (6)
AKI stage 0 Report without alert (7)
AKI stage NA Flag High ? AKI ? CKD
AKI stage NA No flag alert (9)
AKI stage NA insufficient data (10)

Best wishes
Jeff
Jeffrey Barron
Consultant Chemical Pathologist

-----Original Message-----
From: ACB AKI-Detection-Algorithm [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hill Robert (NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST)
Sent: 26 October 2014 13:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Annual fee for LIMS providers?

---
This message was sent from an email address external to NHSmail but gives the appearance of being from an NHSmail (@nhs.net) address. The recipient should verify the sender and content before acting upon information contained within.

The identified sender is [log in to unmask]
---
Hi Jon,

Thank you for posting this.
Members of the detection and measurement workstreams of the AKI project will be meeting with CSC fairly soon - exact date to be arranged.We can clarify their position on this and also
ensure that CSC understands the limited nature of any modifications we intend to make in the future. Ultimately of course this will be a contractual matter between Trusts and CSC.

Other comments refelecting experience with charges proposed by CSC or other LIMS suppliers welcome.

Best wishes,

Robert

Dr Robert Hill
Consultant Clinical Biochemist
________________________________________
From: ACB AKI-Detection-Algorithm [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Murray [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 24 October 2014 09:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Annual fee for LIMS providers?

Hi Robert,

I wondered what the national consensus is regarding routine annual payments to LIMS providers?

Several units in the Northern region use CSC and - in addition to an initial set-up fee - they are mandating our Trusts agree to pay an annual fee (£500 + VAT).  We appreciate the figure is not necessarily substantial but of course feel obliged to ensure that any NHS resource is being used responsibly.  We also appreciate that sometimes it is necessary to maintain a payment for IT 'support' etc - but (as far as I know) this is not routine in such circumstances.  Of course we recognise that - "if, as and when" any updates occur that an upgrade fee would be charged - but of course it may be that no upgrades do occur, or perhaps not for several years.  Certainly when trying to justify payments, it is easier to do so if you are 'getting something' when needed (ie an upgrade) for your Trust's money - rather than committing to long term annual payments 'in case' changes occur at some point in the future.

We would be most grateful for your / others opinion on this - and indeed an idea of what others have done about this (if indeed they have encountered it with CSC or other LIMS providers).

Best Wishes,

Jon

********************************************************************************************************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the
sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents:
to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland
NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients
NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere

********************************************************************************************************************

********************************************************************************************************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the
sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents:
to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland
NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients
NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere

********************************************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

January 2023
September 2021
July 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
December 2019
July 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
July 2017
June 2017
June 2016
April 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager