>Whos: that double negative
?
I worried about the double negative; but now I am quite pleased with it
>liked the ssssounding early on there, too...
I had more!
Think it's about right now
L
On 29 October 2014 20:23, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Whos: that double negative ;liked the ssssounding early on there, too...
>
> Doug
> On Oct 29, 2014, at 6:32 AM, Lawrence Upton <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > He is making a smile less than seraphic,
> >
> > the sea beneath everything and soaking up;
> >
> > an engaged energy; fist hair; nasal hair;
> >
> >
> >
> > hears, and rampage sprouts from him; begins to, slowly,
> >
> > disconcertingly attract; such a personality
> >
> > can be changed; any disposition; buttons; tie;
> >
> >
> >
> > a point of view; an ammunition set;
> >
> > a dangerous preserve, he smirks, winking;
> >
> > an equanimity few may not achieve.
> >
>
> Douglas Barbour
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Recent publications: (With Sheila E Murphy) Continuations & Continuation 2
> (UofAPress).
> Recording Dates (Rubicon Press).
>
> that we are only
> as we find out we are
>
> Charles Olson
>
|