JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GEO-CURATORS Archives


GEO-CURATORS Archives

GEO-CURATORS Archives


GEO-CURATORS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GEO-CURATORS Home

GEO-CURATORS Home

GEO-CURATORS  September 2014

GEO-CURATORS September 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: GEO-CURATORS Digest - 13 Sep 2014 to 17 Sep 2014 (#2014-98)

From:

Christian Baars <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Christian Baars <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:40:24 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Hi Jon,



Principally I would say that chipboard is a poor choice in any museum store. Chipboard emits all sorts of chemicals that can harm specimens, including formaldehyde, peroxides, formic acid and acetic acid. 



This is even more of a problem if the store is not extremely well ventilated - you said you would install this in well-sealed roller racking, which means that the pollutants would actually accumulate inside the roller racking. 



No matter how robust your specimens are at present, this is definitely bad; I have seen many objects in collections deteriorate as a result of acid reactions. Acetic acid will corrode any materials containing metals (including minerals in geological collections; e.g., pyrite decay is catalysed by the presence of acids), and react with carbonate-containing specimens (resulting in 'beautiful' efflorescence of calcium acetate on calcitic fossils, and Byne's disease on egg and mollusc shells). The efflorescence formed by secondary minerals is accompanied by an expansion in volume, resulting in specimens becoming unstable, cracking and eventually crumbling to dust. 



There is also a correlation between volatile organic content emission of wood and temperature. This means that you could reduce the amount of VOCs emitted by your shelving by lowering the room temperature - although this would come at the expense of an increased energy bill. 



Now all of the above obviously depends on the materials you keep in your store. You could undertake a risk assessment (as in risks to the collection, that is) and decide that none of your specimens would suffer from adverse effects if stored in an environment with high VOC content, although in reality most objects stored in museums will suffer from prolonged VOC exposure. 



If starting from scratch I would invest in metal shelving. Should that not be possible, chose a low emissivity wood, such as yew... Alternatively, you could try and get hold of some old (at least several decades), solid, softwood shelving and recycle/adapt this to suit your store. Also, improving ventilation helps in these situations. 



Finally, have you tried asking around the museum sector for second-hand shelving? Shelving is something that is always being replaced somewhere; we certainly seem to move shelving around quite a lot. It might well be that somebody has a sufficient amount of old shelving stored, or is just getting rid of, that may be suitable for your store. 



Kind regards

Christian 







Christian Baars

Senior Preventive Conservator

National Museum Cardiff

Cathays Park

Cardiff CF10 4NP

+44 (0)29 2057 3302

[log in to unmask] 

Twitter @NMWPrevCons









-----Original Message-----

From: The Geological Curator's Group mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of GEO-CURATORS automatic digest system

Sent: 18 September 2014 00:12

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: GEO-CURATORS Digest - 13 Sep 2014 to 17 Sep 2014 (#2014-98)



There is 1 message totaling 29 lines in this issue.



Topics of the day:



  1. Using chipboard



----------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:    Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:18:32 +0100

From:    Jon Radley <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Using chipboard



Geological curators,



Chipboard and some woods have a reputation for giving off pollutants - some of which are potentially harmful to museum collections. However, I'm considering using 18 mm chipboard sheets as a medium-term solution for a storage issue - constructing bases on which to place existing wooden trays of robust fossils, within well-sealed roller racking. We've had a trial run with chipboard and it only bows very slightly with the heaviest trays.



The fossils will not come into direct contact with the chipboard and it's infinitely cheaper than any other materials I've looked at. Has anyone ever had a problem with using chipboard, or even banned it from stores?



Thanks,



Jon



Warwickshire Museum



------------------------------



End of GEO-CURATORS Digest - 13 Sep 2014 to 17 Sep 2014 (#2014-98)

******************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager