http://lelystad.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/rdf-validation/ is an
excellent aggregation point and I'd like a sense from the community if
aggretating still more use cases and requirements from other domains
would be "worth the noise". In particular, how would y'all feel if
there were stories like this attached to reqs?:
[[
R-2.72 dereferencable value sets
A clinic performing a trial has a data entry program which tests each
input value against a remote terminology hierarchy.
R-3.14 query-able value sets
A clinical value set is impractical to ship over the wire so the
validator ships tuples of input value and value set identifier to a
remote service.
]]
If that doesn't seem so bad, how would you feel about 50? I ask
because there are lots of folks who have thought about requirements
for RDF validation but don't have a place to write them down. We can
create a wiki for this, but then we'd have two lists. We can use yours
but then you end up with all this extra stuff from another domain.
The latter is better for me. Which is better for you?
--
-ericP
office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
([log in to unmask])
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.
There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
|