> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Crooks
> Sent: 22 July 2014 15:31
>
> 2. Ian noted that it would be useful to focus on the functional tests used
> and make sure that they test the most appropriate things - the existing
> CVMFS nagios probe might be a useful place to start.
>
> Please let me know by the end of Wednesday if you want to suggest any
> amendments or additions to these points; subsequently we'll pass them on
> to the WLCG Ops and monitoring consolidation meetings.
>
I agree that it would be best to concentrate on functional tests and
let sites worry about the implementation. However, if the idea of the
more detailed/invasive monitoring were to be pursued, I'd want to
know:
- What contacts there have been with the shoal developers or
the WLCG http proxy discovery TF, given that there's clearly
significant potential overlap?
- How the cvmfsmon MonALISA gets the list of squids to care about
(e.g. ganglia style 'anything that reports in', or a static list)?
Ewan
|