I'm not sure that I understand what that means, but I view POST as one of the hidden gems of Parliament. I have followed POST since its early days, not to mention the late lamented US Office of Technology Assessment, which was POST's role model.
Along with the relevant select committees, it is one of the few places where a scientifically illiterate parliament gets some exposure to the real world.
Until now, though, POST has been very low profile. If the plan is to do something about that, great, although it will mean that more people are in the know, which is not always good news for journalists.
Then again, given that, present company excepted, few "science writers" or media outlets show any interest in policy issues – I exclude the ranters who bang on about the NHS in their witter feeds – maybe POST will remain that hidden gem.
MK
-----Original Message-----
From: psci-com: on public engagement with science [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Philip Hunt
Sent: 2014-July-10 08:33
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PSCI-COM] POST Communication Manger
Is this a 'dog in the manger' type of position?
:-) Philip
**********************************************************************
Commands - send an email (any subject) to [log in to unmask] with one of the following messages (ignoring text in brackets)
• set psci-com nomail (to stop receiving messages while on holiday)
• set psci-com mail (to resume getting messages)
• signoff psci-com (to leave the list)
• Subscribe here https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=psci-com
Contact list owner at [log in to unmask]
Small print and JISCMail acceptable use policy https://sites.google.com/site/pscicomjiscmail/the-small-print
**********************************************************************
|