Alan Buxey wrote:
> you want this stuff to work and be adopted, right? there seem to be only
> about a dozen people (well, based on the FR mailing lists) that are able
> to configure a FR server with any complexity in it.
Or, the documentation is so clear and obvious that most people don't
have any issue, and never need to ask questions.
Which I think is partly true. Start the server, point it to Active
Directory, and it Just Works.
> my proposal would deal
> with the other 99.90% of FR admins - some of who are going to have this
> software forced onto them and dont know any unix 101 :\
Yup. My $0.02 would be to have the trust router stuff included in the
default server examples. That way any documentation becomes much simpler.
Alan DeKok.
|