On 31.07.2014 12:49, Peter Wood wrote:
> The Mayor of London has just launched the consultation for a 2050 infrastructure plan. Lots of indicative diagrams for new orbital train networks, underground ring roads, new bridges over the river, cross-city rapid rail lines and extensions to the tube. Nothing much for cycling though. A few mentions of planning to upgrade the existing cycle infrastructure, but no pictures of an aspirational 2050 network, or a narrative explaining how a number of piecemeal projects link up to a cohesive vision. (I think, I only scanned the document.)
>
> Just wondering if anyone had any thoughts/research on why cycling tends to get left out of these grand visions? There have been a few recent proposals for utopian schemes released by the Mayor, such as elevated cycle routes strung alongside train lines. These were generally received as quite impractical and relatively expensive ways to support cycling. But I can't see why they are less plausible than proposals for completely new underground road and rail.
Quite easy, although only a very educated opinion and not research
results: Construction industry's interest in public funds.
regards from Vienna
T+
--
WED, THU & FRI at the University.
--
Tadej Brezina, Univ.Ass. Dipl.-Ing.
Research Center of Transport Planning and Traffic Engineering
Institute of Transportation
Vienna University of Technology
Gußhausstraße 30/230-1 | A-1040 Wien
--
[log in to unmask]
Tel: +43-(0)1-58801-23127
Fax: +43-(0)1-58801-23199
http://www.ivv.tuwien.ac.at
http://www.facebook.com/IVV.TUW
DVR: 0005886
--
(PC TUW-IVV)
|